its micrometers thats nothing. the axis, day length and magnetic north have been changing constantly all the time for millennia.
chefjamesscott;3944014; said:Proof positive that the rulers of this world are a bunch of idiots, deadpans and (^%*&%*&%*&^(&)&)(*() morons.
Surely noone in their right mind thinks that impacting the mooon in such ways is not going to cause issues, especially considering how the moon affects tides.
This has got to be the most idiotic thing I have ever seen in my life!!!!!!!!!


mgk;3944032; said:
I suppose you think all the bombs we dropped in Iraq affected the axis and tides too. proven science is that the moon influences this not iraq
seriously it already happened. It wasn't that big it made a 60 foot crater 10 feet deep. The moon is pretty big
the moon and the earth are hit by meteors all the time, the atmosphere reduce most on that hit the earth. The moon isn't so lucky because there's no atmosphere(well very little), anyway all those craters you see on the moon are made from meteors. MUCH bigger impacts then what we did.chefjamesscott;3944061; said:It is more the fact that an object shot at a celestial object such as the moon and they have what as a guideline as to how much is enough or what is just enough.
I ask you a question HOW MUCH OF AN IMBALANCE IS NEEDED TO OFFSET A GYROSCOPE!
So tell me where did they get the brilliance to think that sending objects to impact the moon was a good idea. From what I know it would not take much of a meteor strike on earth to cause bad things to happen.
Lets take the earth closer to the sun were crispyo farther were an icecube. What is the margin for error when shooting objects meant to impact with the moon maybe they need to use a bigger object next time, shoot did not have the desired effect so lets add a little charge and see if we can get just a bit deeper because you know we really need to have a drink of moon water.
So what if , just what if they happen to hit a home run and strike a nerve as it were with the mooon and cause a fracture point. Ok here is the best metaphor I can come up with for exemplifying what I am trying to say.
Get yourself a tournament quality dart go outside on the coldest day of the winter and chuck the dart at your picture window on your house(wanna roll those dice and hope you don't cause a massive fracture in your window by a tungsten tipped dart), so hey nothing happened heck lets chuck a few or have a game of it. Or take a pan and fill it with water and freeze it, then take an nail place it on the block of ice and hit the nail with a 10 lb sledge.
Maybe just maybe there is a delicate balance at work in the way the planets are orbiting each other yes no? Maybe just maybe that layer of frozen water will act similar to a shear on a glacier and cause a massive crack just like the squirrel on ice age who is obsessed with that dang nut
![]()
There is a far cry difference between shooting rockets at other planet and dropping bombs here, though I dont avocate the dropping of bombs as a good thing.
All I am saying is the scientific community that represents nasa is messing with things they ought not to be.
Nate77;3942403; said:Nasa caused the quakes in the first place no?http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=nasa+bombs+moon&aq=0&aqi=g2&oq=nasa+bombs+
just a thought