Sunpoe said:no one would be stupid enough to put a 10" inch fish in 5 gallon.
apparently your wrong
Cichlid + Arowana = ?
- Thread starter paltik
- Start date
apparently your wrong
paltik said:
Some reason that answer made me laugh the most. Delgaldo isn't a 180 a bit small for all those fish especially a 28" silver ? 
Fried_fish said:
180 is ok for everyone
ill admit its alittle smaller than what it should be for the silver.
but then again HE'S NOT ME!!
dont do what i did, is what im saying
and shes 26 not 28
she doesnt eveen use the entire width of the tank
p.s its not permanent........
paltik said:
why dont you just get a bigger tank?
and i see sarcasm in that post
because that water volume is so small the fish is literally marinating in its own waste, not enough volume to dilute anything, so i wouldnt eat it.
paltik said:it's true! here's a picture of it:
i'm wondering if the arowana would survive with this fish. i'm planning to transfer the arowana to my 75-gallon together with the royal knife when he's grown enough, and the 5-gallon tank would be some sort of a "nursery" tank where he could grow a bit larger.
are u serious
? why would you put a ten inch fish in a five gallon tank? if this is a joke then good one.....but if not ........why would you that to a fish? 
LOLFried_fish said:
DeLgAdO said:180 is ok for everyone
ill admit its alittle smaller than what it should be for the silver.
but then again HE'S NOT ME!!
dont do what i did, is what im saying
and shes 26 not 28
she doesnt eveen use the entire width of the tank
p.s its not permanent........
You changed your signature?! I swear it said 28 inches earlier! I just plucking with you since you seem to be so harsh on newb stuff fish in too small of a tank. Now you can post this under Lesson Learned "Never post the fish you have in signature and the tank they are in unless the space is adequate."
