I think that picture is sufficient. It shows two-thirds of the entire fish.Modest_Man;1217251; said:How bout a photo showing the whole fish?
I think that picture is sufficient. It shows two-thirds of the entire fish.Modest_Man;1217251; said:How bout a photo showing the whole fish?
Fine. You go ahead and post another.nolapete;1219229; said:I think the picture is insufficient to identify the fish.
HerCrenVie;1216303; said:It is NOT facetum. It seems that Singaporeans are simply despised by the West, just because the majority of them are extremely poor in English. I belong to the minority. Please try to identify the fish in the pic I posted before moving on, unless you consider me, a Singaporean, unworthy of any respect on a American/British-dominated forum.
Aquamojo;1219289; said:I just caught the tail end of this, but it seems like you have a chip on your shoulders...especially for this forum. Lot of mixed nationalities here and I've never seem any prejudice to one or the other. Please take a calming breath and enjoy your stay.
Second thing...this thread is for fun. Whether or not a genus name is printed isn't really critical. We all know what's being said.
That aside, I am going to take a stab at your fish and say it's Aequidens pallidus. And it would be helpful to see th entire fish. But as I said...it's just a game...so either way...no big deal.

It's an Aequidens metae.Aquamojo;1219289; said:That aside, I am going to take a stab at your fish and say it's Aequidens pallidus. And it would be helpful to see th entire fish. But as I said...it's just a game...so either way...no big deal.
HerCrenVie;1221320; said:It's an Aequidens metae.
Because some of you said the pic wasn't sufficient to ID the fish.Tongue33;1221325; said:Wow man???? Why did you give it away?? That's no fun post another .