cosmos

[RBoydIV]

Yea, it is silly...I'll describe it in an easy but truthful way.

From absolute nothing their was an explosion, from this explosion a star magically formed with intense heat, then failed matter from the star magically formed into planets, then took a long time to cool down. For Earth, it magically created water and air, then magically life was created from nothing, but not once... but twice. Too make things even better somehow these two lifeforms were able to reproduce. Speed along after these things evolved they continued to magically change into other forms(Monkey to Humans (yet this was a one time process that can't be redone)). The odds of all this is over 1 to 1 zillion.

Even scientists admit there's a more likely chance a tornado can rip through a junkyard and assemble an airplane then odds of us evolving through all that by chance.

Funny how some the smartest men in the history of earth don't think its silly at all. To call it silly is silly in my opinion. All this stuff you call magic I call science and physics but to each his own I guess.

Sent from my XT1080 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

 

[Warborg]

Funny how people can't believe in the other option because they can't see Him but believe in gravity even though they can't see it.

 

[Warborg]

Funny how some the smartest men in the history of earth don't think its silly at all. To call it silly is silly in my opinion. All this stuff you call magic I call science and physics but to each his own I guess.

Sent from my XT1080 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

As it's already been said...pick which magic you want. I'll go with the one in the History book.

 

[Gill Blue]

Yea, it is silly...I'll describe it in an easy but truthful way.

From absolute nothing their was an explosion, from this explosion a star magically formed with intense heat, then failed matter from the star magically formed into planets, then took a long time to cool down. For Earth, it magically created water and air, then magically life was created from nothing, but not once... but twice. Too make things even better somehow these two lifeforms were able to reproduce. Speed along after these things evolved they continued to magically change into other forms(Monkey to Humans (yet this was a one time process that can't be redone)). The odds of all this is over 1 to 1 zillion.

Even scientists admit there's a more likely chance a tornado can rip through a junkyard and assemble an airplane then odds of us evolving through all that by chance.

you might want to update your research a bit. magically hasn't been used by the scientific community for centuries.

granted, some of the things mentioned (or should I say ridiculed) by you aren't understood, but as far as planets forming - understood, the beginning of life - making progress, but duplicating conditions from millions of years ago isn't easy, all things considered. creation of elements, air, water - understood at least partially. we even have the math that seems to correctly predict the ratios of elements we see in our section of the universe. evolution - partially understood. the basics are obvious even from elementary school biology projects, the more advanced stuff is coming.
by the way, evolution isn't a one time thing, it's a continuous ongoing process easily observable in creatures large and microscopic.

considering what I've read in the news about text books in texas, I can see why you'd miss much of the research.

 

[kingofthejungle]

Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Absolute nothing? Then an explosion? From what energy source? Lots of flaws in the big bang theory.

 

[RBoydIV]

As it's already been said...pick which magic you want. I'll go with the one in the History book.

What history book? Do you believe in hobbits and ogres because it was written. You can believe what ever you want but to call science magic is a joke and way out dated. The creator of the big bang theory was a priest. Open your mind a bit man.

Sent from my XT1080 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

 

[Gill Blue]

it's funny that you make assumptions in your statement decrying assumptions.
energy can't be destroyed? there's no way to prove that in the primordial universe(s?) that things weren't different enough that it could be, or even that it can be in different sections of the universe. we're starting to understand that the laws of physics are only applicable here, not necessarily somewhere else.
I agree, I would assume there to be something, but even that I would expect to have had to come from somewhere. but there is plenty of evidence that there was an explosion, that it was immense, and that it affected not just our galaxy, but all the others we've seen.
while the explosion isn't in doubt, the cause is still a mystery.

 

[kingofthejungle]

it's funny that you make assumptions in your statement decrying assumptions.
energy can't be destroyed? there's no way to prove that in the primordial universe(s?) that things weren't different enough that it could be, or even that it can be in different sections of the universe. we're starting to understand that the laws of physics are only applicable here, not necessarily somewhere else.
I agree, I would assume there to be something, but even that I would expect to have had to come from somewhere. but there is plenty of evidence that there was an explosion, that it was immense, and that it affected not just our galaxy, but all the others we've seen.
while the explosion isn't in doubt, the cause is still a mystery.

Which still brings us back full circle. The big bang theory as has been previously stated and taught is flawed. The other thing people must consider is the the financial aspect of science. Some people are naive to think that money doesn't influence science wether it's what findings are released to the public or what research will be funded and by whom.

 

[Gill Blue]

Which still brings us back full circle. The big bang theory as has been previously stated and taught is flawed. The other thing people must consider is the the financial aspect of science. Some people are naive to think that money doesn't influence science wether it's what findings are released to the public or what research will be funded and by whom.

EVERYTHING influences science. there's plenty of research out there that doesn't get out because it contradicts what the initiators of the study wanted to prove. or researchers that consciously or unconsciously altered their results. that's why medical trials are double blind and invalidated with knowledge cross contamination.

as far as the teaching, I agree on that too. too many times humans apply a certainty to uncertain issues. as a species we are more concerned with looking right then being right.

 

[Inglorious]

I find it amusing that people are refuting each others thoughts as impossible because they can't be proven while then giving their own opinion which cannot be proven. Pot meet the kettle.