cosmos

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
not if I am IBTL:lock:
 
Idk if the edit deleted it or what but i tried to respond to aw3somes goonch thread and it put it here for some reason.. dunno why lol app probs, why is it getting locked? This is a good show itd be a shame if it did

Sent from my DROID4 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
dragonfish said:
Disbelieve the theory of gravity and see if you float away.
Click to expand...

dragonfish said:
Hey hey hey! Don't matter what you call it, it's still science-y mumbo jumbo without any basis in what is real.
Click to expand...

Clearly missed my point and clearly lack an understanding of terminology. I'm not taking or supporting or even expressing any "beliefs" for either side of a religion/science debate.

I am simply stating the FACT that there is a difference between a "Theory" and a "Scientific Fact". As someone else already stated, the Law of Gravity is a FACT because it is "provable" through repeatable and measurable experiments.

There is, however, no way for us to repeatably and measurably run an experiment that shows "how the universe/life began". Therefore, any THEORIES about how the universe/life began are just that; THEORIES. They are not FACTS, regardless if you put scientific-labels on them or attribute them to a higher-power.
 
I have this recorded and have yet to watch it. Looks like it will be good!
 
MaddMaxx said:
It is a FACT that all theories about the beginning of life as we know it ("scientific" or "religious") are just THEORIES, neither more provable facts then either.
Click to expand...

only up to a point. scientific theory is based on observations of reality that anyone given the correct knowledge and equipment can duplicate. the big bang theory for example. no-one can prove it by having been there, but the phenomena associated with such an event are there. the interpretation of the data may be wrong, but given the facts, such a theory is much more believable than...
the beginning of life we haven't gotten yet, but we're close. we've made steps towards proving it's possible given certain conditions.
 
Gill Blue said:
only up to a point. scientific theory is based on observations of reality that anyone given the correct knowledge and equipment can duplicate. the big bang theory for example. no-one can prove it by having been there, but the phenomena associated with such an event are there. the interpretation of the data may be wrong, but given the facts, such a theory is much more believable than...
the beginning of life we haven't gotten yet, but we're close. we've made steps towards proving it's possible given certain conditions.
Click to expand...

that's like saying the Mayans observed hurricanes but "misinterpreted the data" as vengeful acts of the gods; but hey close-enough, call it fact
 
no, it's like coming home to find your family dead and blaming the man outside with blood all over him. but whatever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom