If I believed a thing to be true, and were interested in swaying other people to fall into line with my thinking on the matter, I would absolutely be looking for corroborating evidence to strengthen my arguments. But if the first piece of such evidence that I found came from some fringe-quasi-scientific-alternative-news outlet...such as World Freedom Alliance Australia seems to be, IMHO and likely that of many other folks as well...well, I can't help but think that I would look a tad further for a more convincing, less off-putting piece of journalism to bolster my position.
Going a step further, I can't imagine what kind of search query it would take to come up with that item first, rather than something similar from a better-known, more respected and more respectable source. Your search history must be interesting; does it contain words like "inflammatory", "controversial", "questionable", perhaps "non-mainstream"?
I swear, sometimes it seems as though you go out of your way to locate these oddball news bits and bytes. If you are intentionally aiming to rile folks up by pointing out outrageous claims and unbelievable "facts", that would be one thing...relatively harmless, if a bit weird; but when you have an apparent fact that could have been attributed to a news release from something like the Danish health authority, but instead choose to espouse Conspiracy Theory Gazette as your proof...I must ask why?
Going a step further, I can't imagine what kind of search query it would take to come up with that item first, rather than something similar from a better-known, more respected and more respectable source. Your search history must be interesting; does it contain words like "inflammatory", "controversial", "questionable", perhaps "non-mainstream"?
I swear, sometimes it seems as though you go out of your way to locate these oddball news bits and bytes. If you are intentionally aiming to rile folks up by pointing out outrageous claims and unbelievable "facts", that would be one thing...relatively harmless, if a bit weird; but when you have an apparent fact that could have been attributed to a news release from something like the Danish health authority, but instead choose to espouse Conspiracy Theory Gazette as your proof...I must ask why?