If I was a new-born juvenile pup that was cast-netted out of the wild in Colombia just a few months ago... I would not feel any better about being placed on a bright white sand that would make me incredibly vulnerable to predators. White sands and substrates can be just as stressful as beneficial because prey type fish that usually live in dark murky waters, with dark based patterns, would prefer to burrow themselves in a dark substrate in a dark a murkey area.
I've never had an issue putting juvie retics on barebottom with a driftwood hide for them to go behind to feel 'secure'..
I have killed a ray from keeping it on a substrate that looks identicle to that which was supposed to be 'silica' free... I think it depends on the type and size of the ray.
These are the 2 arguments I always hear, "Rays are seen on fine sands like that in the wild and they come in contact with similar substrates in the wild..." - except for the fact if the substrate irritated the ray - it could just move locations. Not possible in a confined aquarium. They do the only thing they know how when they feel insecure from bright whiteness and irritation, burrow themselves, just making it worse.
The other argument is "but my Motoro lived fine on that sand"... I have a pretty strong hunch that large adults rays are not bothered by these types of sands. It might have something to do with slime coat production, not really sure. Either way, I have seen Motoros live happily on some very 'non-ray safe' sand, and so people use that as a generic basis of information for ALL rays.
One of the first Orbignyi we imported wasn't looking so hot, looked a bit stressed in the bare-bottom pond. I thought to myself "Hey this tank with this nice fine white sand is perfect he will feel so much better".. I transfered him, he curled and died within a half hour..
just my 2 cents
ps. Yeah the Fluke tabs ... I was wondering about that?