I hate idiotic pet owners.
Good for you cleaning the tank for the fish's sake - that was sweet of you.![]()
![]()
Maybe their tank should "disappear" and "reappear in your house!![]()
Theft is always a good idea

I hate idiotic pet owners.
Good for you cleaning the tank for the fish's sake - that was sweet of you.![]()
![]()
Maybe their tank should "disappear" and "reappear in your house!![]()

Lockness' Oscar;412242; said:Personally, I think you did the right thing. You saw fish suffering, and you helped them out. You also did the POLITE thing. I applaude you on that. If it were me, I would have gone the ewurm way. That's just me. I CAN'T STAND IT, when someone says that their right, they know everything on the subject, AND insist they MUST have more expirience than you, (in this case) because they are older. I mean, I know people who WORK in fish depts. in stores whom are TWICE my age, and I know more about the fish in THIER DEPARTMENT than them. I don't mind educating them, but it's the ones that think they know more JUST because they are older. Drives me INSANE. ESPECIALLY whan they are WRONG. How big were the commons?? I would like to CONGRATULATE you on the fact that you did all that cleaning for them without even a thank you, and got lectured for it. WoW. Nice.
-Lockness
The Jack Dempsey man
I ordinarily avoid moral discussions on this forum, (except for one I inadvertently started with the 'glowing fish' thread)shekes;421125;421125 said:You (I) and all the other finger-pointing MFKers daily buy and eat meat from animals that were directly or indirectly killed at our convenience. These animals are mainly mammals or birds with highly developped nervous system and intelligence many times superior to any of the fish we keep, yet almost all are kept in inadequate conditions and suffer incomparably more then a fish possibly could.
It doesn't make torturing fish right. But it does make it look rather insignificant in comparison with all the other animal and human abuse going on.
I agree with the rest of your post including the woman being a b1tch (veuruckte cleaned her tank for free! only a b1tch would complain). I disagree with the accusation of immorality as this incidence of her behaviour is still ethically superior to that of any meat, leather etc etc consumer.
Whether or not you define something as a "pet" and assign it more rights, is not everybody's problem. Whether or not a fish is bread for food or is chosen to be loved with perverse dedication as many nerds here do, it is still the same fish. Many of the fish species used as feeders are more intelligent than the "pets" they are fed to. Where is the moral of that practice?
It is bad enough the Law of Western countries arbitrarily prohibits the consumption of canine and feline meat while allowing to abuse pigs and stuff.
It is this short-sighted pet-adoring reality-ignoring atittude that is immoral. The b1tch'es slate is spotless.