packer43064;3912308; said:It's all a matter of opinion, seems a little biased personally.
Its a matter of facts, not opinion.
Feel free to check the stats on flow rate (500gph vs 400gph), power consumption (14w vs 25w), media volume (4L vs basically none), cost of replacement cartridges, and all the other stuff mentioned. The facts speak for themselves.
the only thing the emperor has over the AC is initial cost. But considering the price of replacement cartridges and the fact that the AC110 is known to last over 15years (you won't get that from an emp400) you're looking at around $1000 in savings over the life of the AC110.
it may sound biased, but that's because the pros of the AC110 far outweigh the emperor. The specs of each filter speak for themselves.