Farming Endangered Species for Human consumption

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
sostoudt;3611882; said:
i figure it would be like chicken and beef combined, leaner then a cow but fattier then chicken. perhaps tasting like venison, that is good. perhaps like crocodile, i hear that tastes pretty good.
it could be teriyaki flavored yum teriyaki tiger

Just please, man up and kill it with your bare hands before you eat it. :popcorn:
 
syndicate;3612554; said:
That's stupid Dan he was about education n conservation plus he bought thousand of acres so they could stay untouch habbitats

war⋅ri⋅or


-Noun
1. a person engaged or experienced in warfare; soldier. Like every other Aussie worth their salt, i have the utmost respect for Steve but callin himself a warrior was goin a bit too far!
 
I don't really care whether it is Wild Caught or farmed. If it's calories and/or protein I can gulp it down.

However, why make it difficult, rare, or endangered? There's just too many other sources to even bother with the exotic stuff. I say keep it simple unless you absolutely have to.

When my survival depends on it, I'm open to the difficult "stuff". Their survival or mine? easy choice.
 
Danzig86;3613120; said:
war⋅ri⋅or
-Noun
1. a person engaged or experienced in warfare; soldier. Like every other Aussie worth their salt, i have the utmost respect for Steve but callin himself a warrior was goin a bit too far!

Putting ones self in harms way for a cause would make on a soldier by most standards. So I disagree there, I think he did more for the cause than many of the eco-warriors who do use force to achieve their goals.

As far as farming endangered species. Kind of torn here especially with apex predators, can it actually be done sustainably. I'm not sure how much farming would reduce the stress on native populations. However it might be a good stop gap measure while we educate those primitives that tiger penis or Rhino horn will not cure limp noodle. Would tiger farming make the meat cheap and common thus killing the allure of it and protecting the wild populations again? It would provide these primitives with faith healing supplies, which while pointless would at least protect wild populations.

Where can I sign up for poacher hunts?
 
krzr3000;3612673; said:
Just please, man up and kill it with your bare hands before you eat it. :popcorn:
ill do it when you kill a cow(adult ) with your bare hands. pics or it didnt happen:popcorn:
 
vladfloroff;3613392; said:
Putting ones self in harms way for a cause would make on a soldier by most standards. So I disagree there, I think he did more for the cause than many of the eco-warriors who do use force to achieve their goals.

As far as farming endangered species. Kind of torn here especially with apex predators, can it actually be done sustainably. I'm not sure how much farming would reduce the stress on native populations. However it might be a good stop gap measure while we educate those primitives that tiger penis or Rhino horn will not cure limp noodle. Would tiger farming make the meat cheap and common thus killing the allure of it and protecting the wild populations again? It would provide these primitives with faith healing supplies, which while pointless would at least protect wild populations.

Where can I sign up for poacher hunts?
Eco-warriors??? You mean those show pony douchbags with their butter bombs, watch south park Ep entitled whale whores.
The more i read into hunting poachers the more i'm liking it, i think a .50 sniper rifle is a humane way of dealing with them.
 
Danzig86;3613894; said:
Eco-warriors??? You mean those show pony douchbags with their butter bombs
Among others, there are plenty of them willing to do violence to get noticed but have little overall effect. ALF and ELF are the first to spring to mind.
 
krzr3000;3612673; said:
Just please, man up and kill it with your bare hands before you eat it. :popcorn:
Now that's just plain wrong here's why. Anything we can kill with bare hands (I'm assuming you are being literal so no spear, bows, rock, etc.) would be small and thus require killing a lot of them to eat, rats, mice, flightless birds. Also killing with bare hands is the most inhumane way of doing it. One high power shot to the head or heart for a deer is much quicker than beating it to death with your bare hands. Unless you think pressing is more humane that firing squad?
 
Danzig86;3613120; said:
war⋅ri⋅or


-Noun
1. a person engaged or experienced in warfare; soldier. Like every other Aussie worth their salt, i have the utmost respect for Steve but callin himself a warrior was goin a bit too far!

I'm not 100% sure, but I'm pretty sure he was speaking figuratively. Just a hunch.
 
vladfloroff;3614055; said:
Now that's just plain wrong here's why. Anything we can kill with bare hands (I'm assuming you are being literal so no spear, bows, rock, etc.) would be small and thus require killing a lot of them to eat, rats, mice, flightless birds. Also killing with bare hands is the most inhumane way of doing it. One high power shot to the head or heart for a deer is much quicker than beating it to death with your bare hands. Unless you think pressing is more humane that firing squad?


I could take down a cow with my bare hands.....They let you get close. Jump on their back, and suffocate them. Make sure you fire up the Barby first....
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com