Feeder Turtles!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I wanna see a vid of a $10,000 asian aro choking to death on a 3 cent turtle! :ROFL:

Seriously though, i wouldn't risk it mate..... even though the manager says their for fish, sounds like their more suited to crocs and alligators...
 
Aussienative;612331; said:
I wanna see a vid of a $10,000 asian aro choking to death on a 3 cent turtle! :ROFL:

Seriously though, i wouldn't risk it mate..... even though the manager says their for fish, sounds like their more suited to crocs and alligators...
lol fish in the wild eat crayfish dude said they was a soft shell type i don't think they would choke lol and i am sure in the wild they get ate everday..poor lil baby turtles
 
Esco;610609; said:
what the ****!?!? feeder turtles???

are they just very small red ear sliders? can the fish crush that shell easy? is salmonella a problem for fish?
have any pics of said feeder turtles?
ethically, i just couldent feed them to a fish intentionally. i have a baby RES and that little guy is cool as ****!

salmonella is not a problem for fish

chances are its in your tank right now
 
softturtle;610809; said:
If this makes any difference, I have seen turtles taken by fish in the wild. I imagine it would be good for there diet. Especially, if they are as small as I am thinking. Turtles are pretty soft at small sizes and I don't think it would be a problem digesting.

but it comes down to ethics I guess.

not all fish are capable of digesting a turtle
 
grmanrocks;611504; said:
i prefer to keep ethics out of fishkeeping entirtly....because if u look at it, everything we do is unethical, putting huge fish in a glass box filled with water, no matter how good they r treated has to be no worse than feeding those fish feeder turtles. ive always been one to support a varried diet, to the extreems at times, if there were feeder rabbits my cats would be getting them, trust me. an animal is an animal, let that animal be an animal, it almost hurts when i see my bichirs and dat stoop to eating pellets. never the less its necessary to give them that form of complete nutrution.

by saying that we are monterfishkeepers i was implying that we go to exremes that the other garden variety fishkeepers woulnt consider, including feeder turtles. i think that the term "monster" also is a descripter of the fish keeper himself as well. fish first, everything else second.

i just opted to purchase a polypterus ansogrii over a car.....and will probably end up making several other life discisions around my fish. everything i do IS fish, fishing, fishleeping, plannign on gettin a nmarine biology degree. u can bet ur ass, fish r first in my life, even before myself. which brings me to my second point. i also said that i ditnt know the effects of the turtles tenedency to carry harful pathogens. so if there is enuff research done that comes to the colclusion that the turtles will have no adverse affects on the fish...(cuz why in hell would u feed nething to your fish that could be potentially harmful:nilly: ) then i see nuthing wrong with it.

:iagree:

I would do it if I could.....
 
I think its fair to say we are hesitant and defiant against feeding turtles because we have more of a liking for turtles then say goldfish and frogs.

Just a personal opinion, but if feeder turtles were available in abundance with feeder goldfish i think it wouldn't be an issue.

Saying this i probably couldn't feed baby turtles.
 
grmanrocks;611504; said:
i prefer to keep ethics out of fishkeeping entirtly....because if u look at it, everything we do is unethical, putting huge fish in a glass box filled with water, no matter how good they r treated has to be no worse than feeding those fish feeder turtles. ive always been one to support a varried diet, to the extreems at times, if there were feeder rabbits my cats would be getting them, trust me. an animal is an animal, let that animal be an animal, it almost hurts when i see my bichirs and dat stoop to eating pellets. never the less its necessary to give them that form of complete nutrution.

by saying that we are monterfishkeepers i was implying that we go to exremes that the other garden variety fishkeepers woulnt consider, including feeder turtles. i think that the term "monster" also is a descripter of the fish keeper himself as well. fish first, everything else second.

i just opted to purchase a polypterus ansogrii over a car.....and will probably end up making several other life discisions around my fish. everything i do IS fish, fishing, fishleeping, plannign on gettin a nmarine biology degree. u can bet ur ass, fish r first in my life, even before myself. which brings me to my second point. i also said that i ditnt know the effects of the turtles tenedency to carry harful pathogens. so if there is enuff research done that comes to the colclusion that the turtles will have no adverse affects on the fish...(cuz why in hell would u feed nething to your fish that could be potentially harmful:nilly: ) then i see nuthing wrong with it.


All of that is extremely truthful.
In fact you spoke my mind word for word there; i just had trouble spitting it out.

If only there was a way to document and publish that to the entire keeping society…
I can not see anyone arguing with what you said there, as they are facts…
 
RadleyMiller;611710; said:
well in the US, I would say 90% of turtles under 4" are red eared sliders, and where I live they have become invasive and a nuisance to local pond life.

RES now live/breed on every continent besides antarctica. Very invasive.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com