I happened upon the study by accident, while studying microbiology years ago, and have unfortunately lost track of it.
It made sense because although nitrate is much less toxic than ammonia or nitrite, it is still toxic, so chronic problems from long term exposure seems very reasonable, and because its effects are usually due to long term exposure, the effects are easily mistaken as solely the result of internal parasites, some other unrelated problem.
Back when I started keeping fish in the late 1950s, water changes were thought to be detrimental, and at the time, the oscars and Geophagines I kept, commonly developed HITH. After the general aquarium community (and me) became more enlightened about the positive effects of water changes, I found HITH became a thing of the past.
I remember when the general consensus was that a fish would only grow proportionally to the size of the tank. I believe that lack of growth had more to do with nitrate buildup and other poor water quality issues instead.