Fish ID?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Noto;2665722; said:
CS- no problem!



You're probably just going to come up with another excuse to not admit you were wrong, but here's a picture of a juvenile green sunfish, from a guy who's breeding them: http://forum.nanfa.org/uploads/monthly_01_2009/post-153-1231603465.jpg

Seriously, several of the people you're arguing fish IDs with are professional ichthyologists who are vastly more knowledgeable and experienced than you are. You have a great opportunity to learn from them, but you're wasting it by insisting that you're right in the face of all evidence to the contrary. I'm not saying you shouldn't voice your opinion, but to tell other much more knowledgable people that they don't know what they're talking about is ridiculous.
if that one in the pic is a green then what strain is it cuz i have never seen a green so color less. the only way ill admit im wrong is if theres proof of a different strain or subspecies other wise i say your friends is hybrid
 
I live in California and do a lot of angling around here. I have a local creek by my house and fish in it for fun almost every chance I get and catch these same fish of all sizes. It totally looks like a Green Sunfish to me. I'm not saying I'm right but I have caught some that size and they look exactly alike. By the way my last name is Fish kinda funny huh.... I'm serious it really is.
 
MultispeciesTamer;2666009; said:
if that one in the pic is a green then what strain is it cuz i have never seen a green so color less. the only way ill admit im wrong is if theres proof of a different strain or subspecies other wise i say your friends is hybrid

If you had any experience keeping sunfish you would know that they change color rapidly in response to stress, background color, light intensity, turbidity, etc.; juveniles are especially good color changers. It's not a different strain or subspecies, it's just a different color. And hybrid with what, exactly? There is no sunfish species that has all the characteristics of a green but is pale in color.

You are wrong whether you want to admit it or not. You don't know much about sunfish or any other fish, if your past posts are any sign. There's no shame in not knowing- but the best response is to try to learn, not to bluster and pretend to knowledge you don't have.
 
kagami;2666083; said:
I live in California and do a lot of angling around here. I have a local creek by my house and fish in it for fun almost every chance I get and catch these same fish of all sizes. It totally looks like a Bluegill to me. I'm not saying I'm right but I have caught some that size and they look exactly alike. By the way my last name is Fish kinda funny huh.... I'm serious it really is.

I've noticed Californians switch the names of bluegills and greens...not sure why that is, but it seems to be fairly common. Greens are big-mouthed and bass-shaped, bluegills small-mouthed and tall-bodied.
 
Yeah Noto I know what you mean. I do beleive he is a Green sunfish though not a bluegill upon more investigation. He is not as tall bodied and has a more narrow profile as where bluegill have a taller body and a fatter widder profile. I think most inexperienced anglers just classify all sunfish as bluegill here in California. But sunfish in general are widely introduced in the U.S. I have cuaght several out of the creek by my house and have kept them as pets for fun and they change color quite a bit as you said before. I read some articles on Green Sunfish and Bluegill hybrids, but the only differences they mentioned really were different weights and sizes.
 
Noto;2665579; said:
The Fishes of Illinois by Philip W. Smith is getting old but it's still a good reference, and it should cover most Wisconsin species.

That book is painfully out of date and the drawings are lacking by today's standards. Don't get me wrong...the text is fine but might not captivate someone new to this. I think I paid 35 or 50$ on the book. I would instead recommend Fishes of Missouri by William L. Pflieger and the Peterson guide FW fishes of NA. I think you'll pay about the same price for the last two books as you would on fishes of Illinois. In any case....The Peterson guide is a fantastic starting point for learning and daydreaming.

Not to put salt on a wound...But I honestly believe some members here have been confusing Green sunfish with Bluegill for a looooong time. No biggie but please take a look at an ID book to get past this common error and move along. We're all here to learn and be better for it.

It's important to remember when ID'ing fish that many factors can change color. Color can often mislead an ID if color is used alone. Size/age can be critical when ID'ing and colors will change greatly with age and/or spawning condition.
 
Someone take a fin sample so we can get a DNA/paternity test done. LOL
 
teleost;2666200; said:
That book is painfully out of date and the drawings are lacking by today's standards. Don't get me wrong...the text is fine but might not captivate someone new to this. I think I paid 35 or 50$ on the book. I would instead recommend Fishes of Missouri by William L. Pflieger and the Peterson guide FW fishes of NA. I think you'll pay about the same price for the last two books as you would on fishes of Illinois. In any case....The Peterson guide is a fantastic starting point for learning and daydreaming.

Right you are. I haven't seen the MO book; is it a good book for the midwest in general?
 
drewish;2665253; said:
Are you really that obtuse? Again you have people who know what they are talking about... and you still don't believe them! You should really pick up a few GOOD books. Some of these folks travel the country sampling fish and have permits that require them to be able to ID fish. If we go by what you are saying, 95% of the fish out there are hybrids.

You totally just reminded me of The Shawshank Redemption just there.

MultispeciesTamer;2665290; said:
i hope these guys dont ID fish near me

Many of the people here have been ID'ing fish longer than you've been alive, hell some have made a profession out of it. How you can sit there with virtually no experience of your own (don't deny it because it shows) and completely shoot down what we say is nothing short of amazing. You're out of your leage kid, I suggest you just sit back and listen to what the people here are telling you. If you ever want to be any good at this hobby thats what you'll have to do. Ask questions, take in the information and apply it. I wish when I was 16 and wading around streams I had a resource like this and I tell you, I would have appreciated it. There is nothing wrong with not knowing something, by fighting it you're only embarrasing yourself.
 
Noto;2666152; said:
If you had any experience keeping sunfish you would know that they change color rapidly in response to stress, background color, light intensity, turbidity, etc.; juveniles are especially good color changers. It's not a different strain or subspecies, it's just a different color. And hybrid with what, exactly? There is no sunfish species that has all the characteristics of a green but is pale in color.

You are wrong whether you want to admit it or not. You don't know much about sunfish or any other fish, if your past posts are any sign. There's no shame in not knowing- but the best response is to try to learn, not to bluster and pretend to knowledge you don't have.

I've told him this; lots of times. It dosen't seem to sink in.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com