fish is pls

[kewpiefishypewpie]

Agreed with everyone so far, if you got it from a reputable source I see no reason to doubt that's what it is. The variation in Sagittae is insane too.

 

[RD.]

Unless someone can prove otherwise, it's exactly what you purchased it as.

 

[Numbnuts]

Unless someone can prove otherwise, it's exactly what you purchased it as.

Ty

 

[Mad About Cichlids]

Do you have more photos of this fish. Hard to say but At first glance it looks like a rose queen flowerhorn or whatever.

 

[Numbnuts]

Do you have more photos of this fish. Hard to say but At first glance it looks like a rose queen flowerhorn or whatever.

these pics are about 6 months ago

 

[kewpiefishypewpie]

Didn't we all establish that you should just go with what it was sold as? I have no reason to believe that's not a Sagittae if you got it from a reputable dealer.

 

[RD.]

Exactly .......

 

[Mad About Cichlids]

A few random people on a fish forum has made the call for everyone lol.

Imo be responsible if you're unsure than just list it as unknown.

 

[RD.]

LOL, like you did suggesting that it looks like a rose queen Flowerhorn, based on a single low quality image posted online. That's funny .....

There's absolutely no reason for anyone to think that this Amphilophus is anything but what the vendor listed it as.

 

[Mad About Cichlids]

I did not suggest anything besides saying that first thing that came to mind. Funny i was the only one to ask for more photos trying to properly is it.


Vendors/stores are not perfect, mistakes do happens.