FX5 or not

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
On my 75 gallon heavy stocked and generously fed, I use just one Marineland Canister filter C-530 GPH and it's not a nitrate factory, not sure what the big fuss is. Obviously, they do need to be maintained and cleaned, just like a sump and PWC weekly should be standard. Sumps from what I can tell is for rocket scientists who like to make it more difficult then it really needs to be. I'm planning on adding a couple of sponge filters too. The nitrate factory argument is dated and debunked.

Sumps produce less nitrates then canisters- there is no debating that, its 3rd grade science
 
the op got what he wanted and chose the fx5 stop your chitter chatters and stop bringing up old useless threads......

yeah whats worse discussing pros and cons of canisters or posting a snobby response with no usefull info.....

Post info or dont post at all. If you cant deal with other poeple's opinions then find somewhere else to sociallize
 
If those filters got the GPH they stated the OP would have over 20x flow rate lol. His fish would be spinning in circles.

I like how everyone says these filter are great, but you need FX5 and Ehiem 2262 for a 70 gal tank. If a 2262 cant filter a 70 gal alone, then whats the point of buying them?
 
I like canister filters on some tanks. They are well known for being nitrate factories if not cleaned somewhat regularly. All the stuff builds up in the filter and creates nitrates that would be completely removed by a filter sock that was changed out weekly.

I don't think you understand why he said they were inefficient energy wise. It almost seems like you put no thought in your reply. You can't just compare two pumps with similar flow rates then boldly state efficiency with energy argument debunked. You might have noticed there is more to a sump or any filter than the pump. You can take the 1262 pump from the 2262 or the mag drive 9.5 and combine that with a 40 gallon breeder, 15 gallons of substrat pro, matrix, or biomax, and a filter sock and have a far more efficient filter comparing energy usage with the filtering results you get. I realize that you have to change a filter sock that makes a little maintenance, but if that's too much for a person they probably shouldn't be keeping fish.

Well said...
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com