I support the Glo-fish as they were created to detect water pollutants. They are suppose to lose their color when the water is contaminated, it was public (and the money) that brought them into the pet trade. When they first hit the pet shops around here, the glo-fish sold for about $10 each currently they sell for about $5 each.
Glo-fish VS. Dyed fish
- Thread starter Miomo
- Start date
- Status
on thing about glofish that bothers me, is the backlight use. ive heard that the UVA light from them blinds some fish.
i wonder how the danios fair under it.
the best research i could do into why it blinds the fish, is because the pupil doesnt contract to blue light properily, so basically its like the pupils are dialated for night time but theres a whole bunch of light coming in. does anyone know if this is right?
i wonder how the danios fair under it.
the best research i could do into why it blinds the fish, is because the pupil doesnt contract to blue light properily, so basically its like the pupils are dialated for night time but theres a whole bunch of light coming in. does anyone know if this is right?
sostoudt;3254390; said:what do you think a tattoo is? it is a needle with dye that is repeatedly punctures the skin lol. thats how they draw the pictures on the fish.
so it definitely is a tattoo
and... they dont draw it
Miomo;3254618; said:
what would you call making pictures then? people say to draw or paint because its the definition of draw is
its may be different with glassfish, they may need only one puncture then a injection of dye in to there cavities. but other fish are tattooed differently.
btw talk about hideous, those fake flowers look horrible. who would buy them lol
- Status
