Ozkar;984882; said:What about all the waste that stays in the gravel? Wouldn't it be better to remove as much of the fish waste via the filter and siphoning than to have a lot left in the gravel to add to nitrate (eventually)?
I would love to hear more on your opinion on this Chompers! I am grasping at straws trying to improve my nitrate levels. Even with large water changes, it never gets below 20ppm. Any ideas? (without hijacking the thread of course)
The majority of ammonia comes from fish urine. Yes, it is better to remove as much fish waste as possible when you do your weekly tank maintenance.
The myth is that gravel or UGF filters produce nitrates which is false. It only borrows time. The myth comes from people that don't do tank maintenance, and think that you can add food to a closed system and never have to remove the waste (as if the UGF magically makes it dissappear). They enjoyed a period of low nitrates while gunk built up in the gravel. When you let it go to the point of having 100ppm of nitrates and then do a 20% water change replacing with water having nitrates of 10ppm, the end result will only be a reduction to 82ppm. Having a fish load that produces 10ppm weekly, it will look like you never will make any progress. Combine that with bad fishkeeping habits and the nitrates will always be out of control. When the fishkeeper does say, 25% water changes every other month and then the nitrates are always through the roof, the blame has to lie somewhere and it ain't gonna be with the fishkeeper.
Now take yourself to your local fish store, and you are watching some guy buy his first fish tank along with ten oscars, twelve pacu, and six months worth of feeders (cycling be damned). What kind of filter is he going to have??? That's right, a UGF that came with the tank. A year later, with the same UGF, he joins a fish site and starts dishing out advise like an expert. After all, he has a full year of fish killing experience. Keep in mind that anyone with a computer can be an expert on the internet. He presents his speculation as fact and then the next guy, none the wiser, repeats what he has "learned" when another person is looking for answers (what I call monkey-see-monkey-do advise).
Have you been to one of those fish sites populated by stay-at-home moms that "take care" of their kids fish tanks? There's lots of weird stuff coming from those sites.

at the comment about sites being populated by "S-A-H mom's" etc. Being a "stay at home mom with fish", I'm wondering what sites you mean...I have never come across ANY sites that are populated with women...Fishkeeping is definately a Male dominated hobby. If anything most of the misinformation is probably coming from the men that dominate the hobby and the forums... I understand that being educated in the science of fishkeeping you must come accross alot of idiots not willing to learn or take advice.....If we are going to take into account stereotypes....I have a hard time believing that the majority of the "misinformed idiots" out there are women.