H. scomberoides sudden death

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Main point why scombs die in captivity so early is that we can not provide a suitable home for them. Im sure if we could provide them with a 450 gallon tank with minimal tankmates they would strive for a long time. We as fans of alot of different types of fish and stingrays arent dedicating our main systems to try and house these guys. They have a pair of scombs at the shedd aquarium that are about a foot long. They are given a large space and are doing fine


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
First, I wish to let you know that I do respect your opinion.

Now, I feel that the reason you're likely having such a push back about this is because of your tone. You come into these threads and type your messages in a way that read in an overtly hostile manner. This causes people who may not agree with your point to respond to you in a similar manner, which in short order will cause the thread of conversation to degenerate.

Now, I might not have nearly as many posts as you, but my join date shows that I'm no spring chicken. In fact, I've been keeping since 1998. I have kept my current scomb for eight months. It's not two years, I'll conceded that. However, he's not 'suddenly died' on me either. My first fish scomb did die. I tried keeping him in still water. He died in less than a week. The only change between then and now is that I added 4000 gph of current into the tank and took out all of my aquascaping to give much more swimming space. My current scomb has grown from four inches to eight inches and has put on a bunch of girth.

Now, you say that if these fish didn't die, there would be a bunch of big ones around. Your logic is flawed. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. I am quite sure that there are hundreds if not thousands in the US alone. This website is a powerful resource, but it is not the end all, be all of fishkeeping. There are a whole bunch of experienced old timers who don't give a darn about the internet and are not represented proportionately here.

As for the two year lifespan of H. scomberoides, I don't consider that to be a concern or knock against the fish. These fish are described in scientific literature as reaching a maximum of 40 centimeters. As you well know, 12 inches is a hair over 30 centimeters. If a 40 cm fish is the maximum size that you can expect a member of this species to achieve, then a 30 cm fish would seem to be fairly near the center of a Gaussian bell of the typical adult sizes of these fish. I can't find any properly written articles on the lifespan of H. scomberoides, so I can't hazard a guess on how old the fish live in the wild, but it strikes me as likely that a 30 cm or 12 inch fish is who dies after two years has probably lived its natural lifespan and has died a natural death.

Once again, in my experience, I've seen no empirical evidence to support the idea that payara die. There are enough being kept successfully for years at a time for me to consider their death to generally be the fault of keepers or that they have died a natural death at the end of a short lifespan. All I can see from the people who support the sudden death idea is ranting tirades from individuals who, to be honest, just seem quite jaded.

I tried for several years to disprove this "myth". Year after year I made improvements and changed things. My rays seemed to do fine, my other Characins seemed to do fine. We all tried to figure it out, and it seemed we failed. I failed to disprove the myth, so is it really a myth? Apparently it still is. I find it kind of disrespectfull to tell someone who tried so hard are put forth so much effort that they simply don't know what they're talking about.....

You say that there's hundreds or thousands of these fish in posession of the people that don't care about the internet. My view is there's hundreds or thousands killed every year cause people have no clue what they're getting into with these fish. They buy them cheap, grow them up, and sell them. Year after year people can't provide proof that they do well and grow big in captivity, and I'm just supposed to believe there's plenty out there? Yeah, maybe my opinion is flawed, but surely someone who has a giant Armatus knows someone who is on the internet, funny there's so many fishing pics out there, and pics floating around the internet of the big ones over seas, yet we can't cough up a few out of all the hobbyists on this site? I bet there was hundreds of MFK members that bought Armatus every year, yet how many hit 2' ++? Did all those MFK members sell thiers to people without the internet? That captive care guide sticky we wrote was done because of the crazy amount of care questions always popping up in this section of the forum by memebers of this site who had Armatus and the internet. Obviously there were lots of them out there. I see no reason why there's lots of pics of juvies and no adults.

Nobody likes a negative nancy, so I understand that being the debbie downer here could rub people the wrong way, and I apologize for that. Believe me nobody wants to figure this out more then me, but the first step in solving any problem is verifying or duplicating it. If we all continue to shroud ourselves in a bubble of reality where Payara do well in captivity then it's gonna be pretty hard to move forward....

You'd be argumentative to if you had an opinion with several years of experience to back it up that is viewed as a "myth" rather then actual real world experience.

I'm not trying to be the bearer of bad news, or crap in everyones cheerios, but all the evidence that there's a problem with our care for these things is and has been festering throughout this site for years and years, all you have to do is search for it or remember it if you were around for it.
 
I tried for several years to disprove this "myth". Year after year I made improvements and changed things. My rays seemed to do fine, my other Characins seemed to do fine. We all tried to figure it out, and it seemed we failed. I failed to disprove the myth, so is it really a myth? Apparently it still is. I find it kind of disrespectfull to tell someone who tried so hard are put forth so much effort that they simply don't know what they're talking about.....

You say that there's hundreds or thousands of these fish in posession of the people that don't care about the internet. My view is there's hundreds or thousands killed every year cause people have no clue what they're getting into with these fish. They buy them cheap, grow them up, and sell them. Year after year people can't provide proof that they do well and grow big in captivity, and I'm just supposed to believe there's plenty out there? Yeah, maybe my opinion is flawed, but surely someone who has a giant Armatus knows someone who is on the internet, funny there's so many fishing pics out there, and pics floating around the internet of the big ones over seas, yet we can't cough up a few out of all the hobbyists on this site? I bet there was hundreds of MFK members that bought Armatus every year, yet how many hit 2' ++? Did all those MFK members sell thiers to people without the internet? That captive care guide sticky we wrote was done because of the crazy amount of care questions always popping up in this section of the forum by memebers of this site who had Armatus and the internet. Obviously there were lots of them out there. I see no reason why there's lots of pics of juvies and no adults.

Nobody likes a negative nancy, so I understand that being the debbie downer here could rub people the wrong way, and I apologize for that. Believe me nobody wants to figure this out more then me, but the first step in solving any problem is verifying or duplicating it. If we all continue to shroud ourselves in a bubble of reality where Payara do well in captivity then it's gonna be pretty hard to move forward....

You'd be argumentative to if you had an opinion with several years of experience to back it up that is viewed as a "myth" rather then actual real world experience.

I'm not trying to be the bearer of bad news, or crap in everyones cheerios, but all the evidence that there's a problem with our care for these things is and has been festering throughout this site for years and years, all you have to do is search for it or remember it if you were around for it.

I can certainly understand your point of view in regards to these fish in light of your experience. Given the circumstances that you appear to be describing, I'm concluding that you tried to keep your fish in a 'monster' community tank? Or did you do cater the tank to their needs? edit- by cater to their needs, I mean keep the fish in a large tank by its self or with other current loving characins in a tank with a ridiculous amount of current.

I have a feeling that your probably right in regards to these fish having a hard time reaching maturity due to the care provided by the owners. I feel its probably fair to say that Americans on the whole tend to be not as committed to things as our Asian counterparts, be it in fishkeeping or anything else. I feel that there are likely more large fish in east Asia due to the dedication of their keepers. I find it hard to believe that fish imported to America are more likely to die than those imported to east Asia. I've noticed that a lot of the big payara and tigerfish in Asian tanks have only those fish with a few bottom dwellers that are compatible.

I've also noticed that the vast majority of American keepers who attempt to introduce these fish to their tanks have a wild assortment of fish. The American keepers (in general, not everyone) keep their payara in general community tank conditions on a monster scale. Few of us go out of the way to simulate the payara's natural powerful riverine habitat, as most 'normal' aquarium fish would be quite stressed by this environment. On the other side of that coin, I find it likely that payara are stressed by the lack of a riverine environment.

This is why when I give advice to people interested in the silver tooth fish that in order to be successful, they need to cater the tank to the needs of the fish.

Part of the reason I believe you have had success with Rhaphiodon, and I'll admit that this is conjecture without knowing your exact setup, is because Rhaphs are not riverine. They are normally found in open water of lakes or impoundments, where as Hydrolycus and Cynodon prefer waters with powerful currents. If a Rhaph was kept in a 'normal' aquarium setting, it would stand to reason that they would thrive where as the other genera would struggle to survive or die.

A final point to consider. I feel that a 15-18 inch armatus is probably close to or at maturity. I feel this is evidenced by the fact that they tend to grow very quickly to this point and then slow down dramatically. It seems reasonable that if the fish is mature at 18 months to two years old at about 18 inches long, it would grow slowly past that point. The four footers we see people catching while fishing are likely very old fish, and getting a domesticated one to four feet, three feet or even thirty inches would probably take a very, very long time. Again, I've not seen anything in the journals that indicates that there is an age study for the members of Cynodontidae, so this is all conjecture until we see the results of further studies.

I'm interested to know exactly what kinds of setups you tried with your payaras over the years.
 
Like what chicx said above, I keep my armatus solo (other than 1 bichir tankmate at the moment) with plenty of current in the tank and he seems to be happy for the time being. When it comes time to upgrade I know what this fish requires and will plan my next upgrade according to the armys needs. Hopfuly I will be one of the limited people to raise one from a 6 incher to a true monster.

With more people wanting to own a silver toothed fish species, hopfuly we can all compile our information, observations, and practices and develop a good knowledge of how to properly provide for these fish in an aquarium setting.
 
Growout tanks ranged from 75 with a few ac 110s and fluval 405s to 3x4 footprint with 3600 gph return pumps, with additional powerheads. Tried them in bigger tanks, tried them in large ponds. Could they have had more current? Maybe if I removed all the sand so it didn't blow around I could have gotten more but I thought seeing that meant it was enough.

The "community" tankmates were always centered around these fish. I sold flagtails, Fronts, Dats, Aros, Gars anything that even remotely posed a threat to thier well being.

I think it has a lot more to do with the night and day difference in our water parameters (opposed to native habitat) then it does to do with simply adding current.

I don't keep discus, so I don't know, but my understanding is Discus don't breed in high PH high mineral content water, yet can thrive and reproduce when RO gets involved.

Maybe oxy content? Crashing white water vs a glass box with a powerhead?

Most of all I think tank size is overlooked.... I also think dripping tap straight into the tank VS aerating/aging the water is something that ashould be considered.
 
Growout tanks ranged from 75 with a few ac 110s and fluval 405s to 3x4 footprint with 3600 gph return pumps, with additional powerheads. Tried them in bigger tanks, tried them in large ponds. Could they have had more current? Maybe if I removed all the sand so it didn't blow around I could have gotten more but I thought seeing that meant it was enough.

The "community" tankmates were always centered around these fish. I sold flagtails, Fronts, Dats, Aros, Gars anything that even remotely posed a threat to thier well being.

I think it has a lot more to do with the night and day difference in our water parameters (opposed to native habitat) then it does to do with simply adding current.

I don't keep discus, so I don't know, but my understanding is Discus don't breed in high PH high mineral content water, yet can thrive and reproduce when RO gets involved.

Maybe oxy content? Crashing white water vs a glass box with a powerhead?

Most of all I think tank size is overlooked.... I also think dripping tap straight into the tank VS aerating/aging the water is something that ashould be considered.

I think you may be on to something with the wildly different water perimeters of their native Amazonian environment as opposed to the available tap water. There is a vast difference in the quality and mineral content of the water from place to place here in the States. That does make sense, and would explain why some people have luck and others don't. I'll bet this is the crux of the issue.

For your flow, how were you directing it? I have two Koralia 1400s at the top right of the tank pointed longways at the surface of the water in an effort to simulate whitewater and a little 150 gph powerhead fed by an air pump pumping bubbles out right between them. This gives me a buttload of microbubbles in the tank with enough bubbles on the surface to have a nice white froth. I also have another 1400 on the bottom left of the tank pushing water in the opposite direction as the two on the top, so they're working together to push water. The outlet of the FX5 pushes water down from the top left and there's a big bubble disc on the bottom right to help water rise. I have a very strong current considering that the tank is tiny, its only a 150. I have very clean, quality water here too, spring fed Missouri Ozarks stream water. Granted this isn't crashing white water, but so far it seems to be doing ok for me. I'm also religious with water changes.
 
i believe those pics are Armatus, not Scomb... i've never heard of a scomb reaching that size in tank, or in nature... awesome looking fish though, could you imagine catching something like that? or better yet having one in your aquarium? :D

Sent from my DROID RAZR using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
Is it just a matter of measuring/testing the right thing? Need to figure out exactly what parameters we need to be watching.... Orp? TDS? Conductivity? Then just try to mimic their natural settings.

Why exactly do they need so much current?
 
Is it just a matter of measuring/testing the right thing? Need to figure out exactly what parameters we need to be watching.... Orp? TDS? Conductivity? Then just try to mimic their natural settings.

Why exactly do they need so much current?

I'm note sure why they need so much current tbh. It's just that these fish favor high current areas in the wild and it seems to me that they would do best in a similar environment. Honestly, I went with a ton of current more for the ATF than the payaras, but the payaras seem to be thriving in it as well.

All I have for my water chemistry is the API master kit. It would probably be a good idea for those of us who are keeping these fish to gather our perimeters to compare. Good idea. Were would I get the equipment to test those other perimeters though? I haven't the foggiest... :nilly:
 
Contact your water local water center. They should be able to tell you mineral contents with ppm along with other basics like alkalinity and ph etc.

Sent from my GT-I5510M using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com