nutty;5121970; said:I think this thread should be changed to 'Have a melanurus', since synspila is no more!
Nice melanurus everyone.![]()
Not trying to be a wise guy...but what are you talking about?
nutty;5121970; said:I think this thread should be changed to 'Have a melanurus', since synspila is no more!
Nice melanurus everyone.![]()
thor meeki;5122402; said:Not trying to be a wise guy...but what are you talking about?![]()
nutty;5121970; said:I think this thread should be changed to 'Have a melanurus', since synspila is no more!
Nice melanurus everyone.![]()
Ctrl_Alt_Dlt;5096654; said:Jannie---nice big ones! Whats the lingage history on them?
nutty;5122701; said:Googling pictures is a useless tool imo as allsorts of photos can come up.They are now classed as the same fish. Melanurus was described first (Günther, 1860), so therefore melanurus will take preference over synspilus.
You can now say that you have gained a new species over night.
I think if we need to dabate further, perhaps we should start a new thread as not to spoil this one.
Lee.