lovespunaround;1294165; said:If they only grow that long in captivity, where they're fed significantly more than in the wild, it's a good sign that they don't need to be fed that much to be healthy. Do you consider the wild population to be starving because they don't eat enough as captive snakes and therefore don't grow as long, whether they're otherwise completely healthy and successfully reproducing?
davo;1294390; said:If you are replicating the diet of an animal, as it would have in it's natural environment there is nothing necessarily wrong with that. Captive environments mean we can spread out the amount of food they get, so it's not necessarily bust or boom feeding schedules however. Many reptiles and fish (if not all) can attain larger lengths in captivity than they necessarily would in the wild. There are usually one or two wild specimens that will be considered "monsters" but in captive conditions, could be the norm. However, it may be important to point out that feeding more than they would eat in the wild, can be very detrimental to their health. Of course it would effect different species differently, depending on how fine a ecological niche they fit in.
Thermoregulation, fleeing enemies or just looking for a new place to hide in general, and sometimes just cruising around for the hell of it.Since when do snakes 'excersise' in nature other then when hunting or mating anyway...
It's obviously not hurting them not to eat an appropriately-sized frozen/thawed rodent every seven to ten days.Every animal in the wild does not get food offered on a plate, they go hungry near enough all the time.