So other than the baseless accusation that a cable news commentator made about scientists at the CDC "cherry picking" data about the need for children to get immunized, to what - specifically - are you referring?
Beware language and the art of manipulation (msn.com)
“As The Federalist explained in a 2015 report on manipulating voters, "When polls show a majority of folks favor a policy or candidate, it marginalizes those who disagree with the poll, peer-pressuring them into conformity by making them think their opinions are unpopular, invalid, or irrelevant."”
“Injecting scientific consensus into an argument shuts down debate.”
“Wildfires in California are attributed to global climate change even though there were considerably less fires in western Canada during the same period of time. Both extreme hot and cold are considered to be effects of global warming”
“Another example is the science of the COVID-19 pandemic, where two men of science espoused divergent views: Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Scott Atlas, the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow in health care policy at the Hoover Institution, who was a special adviser on the virus to former President Trump. Some in the media labeled Fauci "America's Voice of Reason in 2020." He advocated for closing the economy and schools. Dr. Atlas was branded as a "controversial former Trump adviser." His views were more in line with the Great Barrington Declaration recommending "focused protection" of those most vulnerable, such as seniors and those with pre-existing conditions.”
“Legacy media largely reported the science-according-to-Fauci, dismissing any science that challenged the mantle of consensus he claimed. Many media outlets also failed to report inconsistencies in Fauci's positions over time.”
Hello; (my comments) The above link is the first I came across so far. I was not doing a search it was among the stuff which shows up when I log on to the web. I pulled a few quotes to give an idea of the contents. I suggest any who want to be sure of the context read the article for themselves. I will refrain from too many comments. I suppose the last quotes are the more relevant to the thread discussion.
I will find more specific information in time to answer your challenge.