yea, links not working, but i'm confused sparty.
you've made claims in this thread that were proven false. they did not make it illegal to feed the homeless. the old man was not arrested, only cited. unless the source eddie provided were incorrect.
no one is against feeding the homeless. we've only stated that there is an ordinance in place and that the old guy has to abide by it.
I get that you were upset because maybe you thought they made it illegal to feed the homeless. but now that you know that is not true, how do you feel about it? do you feel that ordinance is not fair? should they leave the old guy to feed any time, anywhere he pleases?
you keep going on about how messed up they are treating this guy but you never really address the details
btw, I don't mind being insulted. but explain to me why so I can understand where you are coming from