I said the spangles on the fins not the "markings" on the body numb nuts, but if you knew cichla you would know what I was talking about.
There are only 15 described species (a fraction of which are imported and an even smaller fraction are bred), these fish were captive bred, sold as kelberi, look like kelberi, and are kelberi. Kelberi do not come from the places you posted (which are misspelled by the way.) Rio Tapajos is in the Amazon river drainage, Tarapoto is in Peru, and Enviria lake is also in Peru.
Oh and to bring the whole do you know what species it is back to you, why do you say they are ocells? They are not ocellaris, they are not monoculus, which leaves one similar species (which is the only species of the cichla mentioned that has gold spangles on the anal fin) KELBERI.
Why do you keep saying I don't know what it is when clearly you don't know what it is? There's no need for DNA testing when the taxonomic descriptions match the fish the OP has.
I'm going to call you dumb, because you are still trying to say they are something they aren't and because you are insulting me when I was trying to be civil with you.
I'm right-You're wrong-his fish are kelberi-move on.