Why is the new post feed always filled with tiny bloody nano tanks n crap! Posting there nano tanks thinking its acceptable.BS.. There should be a 55 gallon tank limit atleast for fark sake. I thought this was mfk not bait fish keepers.com...
I thought this was MONSTERfishkeepers
- Thread starter Oz fish guy
- Start date
LOL! 55 gallons is hardly monster compared to the "swimming pools" that some members have or have had.
There’s a wide variety of tanks. There are some big tanks on here still. Some members have large tanks and others not so much. I think it’s what members can handle (keep and afford). Gotta roll with the changes.
Lol, agreed!
OP, you’re welcome to not read any of the threads you don’t want to. While this forum is called MonsterFishKeepers, and is a place where a lot the people in the hobby with huge tanks tend to join and discuss their setups, the forum is still very accepting of all types and sizes of tanks. Many of us, in addition to our larger tanks, have smaller ones too. I have a 220, 29, and a 10. Does this mean that anything regarding my 29 and 10 should not be allowed to be posted on here?
you are always all to keen to jump against me richo.. i ment there should be 55gal minimum.. and yeah i kinda joined this forum thinking sweet i dont own 5 gal nano tanks to i will join this forum *thinking its where the big dogs hang out but it seems this site is definitely evolving into something i dont care about nano tanks or how to keep barbz alive lol i care about monsters.
yeah i thought it would be a more monster oriented site at first but it has proven to not be the case. i dont keep any tanks larger than 100 gallons currently but im still an avid researcher and observer of monster fish that others keep, hence why i enjoy this site.
i dont think I'll ever keep huge fish if im being honest, not a big fan of the common monster aquaria like pbass, rays, gars, etc. monster tanks seem like a monster hassle. id like to have a 300 gallon one day and an oscar pond maybe but that is it. theres just so many fish in the under 12" range that are so interesting and fun to keep.
i dont think I'll ever keep huge fish if im being honest, not a big fan of the common monster aquaria like pbass, rays, gars, etc. monster tanks seem like a monster hassle. id like to have a 300 gallon one day and an oscar pond maybe but that is it. theres just so many fish in the under 12" range that are so interesting and fun to keep.
Kinda not really? I joined because it was mfk. Not nanofk. Im just thinking out loud. I hardly log on i wanna see more big prime stuff. It seems the good stuff was posted early. (2005ish) ive revived so many early post lol joined late is all and having a windge. I love keeping fish..
Yeah bro i thought the same... big fish are a pain in the ass compared to community fish. But also surprisingly rewarding
I aint against ya I just found the 55 gallon mention funny as I have seen posts from others in the past state that a tank is not truly monster unless it is 300 gallons or more.
I think of 55 and 75 gal tanks, as grow out tanks for fry.
To me the the most irritating posts are those where too large a fish are crammed into too small a tank, with too few water changes..
I consider an oscar in a 75, where water is changes once or twice per month, to be in that irritating category.
To me, educating about keeping the proper sized fish, in the proper sized tank is the goal, not subjecting a monster to cramped or squalid conditions.
To me the the most irritating posts are those where too large a fish are crammed into too small a tank, with too few water changes..
I consider an oscar in a 75, where water is changes once or twice per month, to be in that irritating category.
To me, educating about keeping the proper sized fish, in the proper sized tank is the goal, not subjecting a monster to cramped or squalid conditions.
