kamikaziechameleon;5008259; said:euthanizeing under the assumption it will endure more stress is definitely playing god. You don't know that it will end up worse off.
Very true. I don't know for sure that my fish will suffer needlessly until death. But just for fun, what would you say the odds are that a fish returned to Pet## is adopted by a caring dedicated cichlid lover with an adequate sized tank?
We at MFK definitely tend to do a better job of keeping fish and accommodating their needs but still we are dealing with animals that can't really be tamed/domesticated as much as conditioned.
Yes you, us, we here, at MFK. What about the rest of the world? I'd have no quarrels giving an oscar to an educated MFKer... but not Joe Schmoe who lives down the road who still has a gold fish bowl and a 'big' 20g high tank with a 11" pleco and some sword tails....
You argue that the fish has to suffer being rehoused, a little pain for allot of happiness is par for the course in this hobby. He'll be happier in the end alive than dead. They are animals after all and their #1 goal in existence is to survive, #2 is make babies. If the fish was dieing then you could make the argument for putting him down but this case it just seems like neglectful fish keeping.
A little pain? How can you quantify that? Do we know what it feels like to have ich? Do we know what living in Ammonia rich water feels like? - We know it can kill them and significantly shorten their lives...
He'll be happier in the end alive, if he's well taken care of which is a gamble.
