fugupuff;523230; said:still like your idea better....
rallysman;523231; said:well, atleast it would get the truth out I suppose![]()
Well done Wes,fugupuff;523215;523215 said:This is what I wrote them, I hate these people, can't stand them, and that idiot posing with the fish like he's bad!!!
The fish listed is not a piranha, pygocentrus nattereri formerly in the genus serrasalmus. the picture of the fish shown is a colossoma macropomum, a close relative of the piranha, but completely harmless, mostly eats vegetables, that is why they caught it with a dough ball, on top of that, the teeth would be a clear give away, the piranhas have razor sharp, but small teeth, while the picture depicted these large human incisor type teeth commonly seen in large pacus. Its important to publish the right information and not sensationalize the obvious. When the wrong information is publicized, not only will it make your paper appear non-credible. Here is also an internet site link that alerted me to this misinformation, please take some time to read it.
http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40306
If you have further questions, please direct it to Dr. William Fink at University of Michigan, he has worked extensively with these fish and would be able to further support my claim.
Bad publicity and erroneous information will not only hurt the aquarium hobby, but also lead to more misconceptions. The snakeheads found in Maryland were deliberately released by resturant owners, not by careless aquarium hobbyist. People should definitely not release exotic species in our waters, but getting the information right is just as crucial!
Best Regards,
Wes
guppy;523314; said:Well done Wes,
I also sent a similar E-mail through this link http://www.dnr.state.md.us/mailroom.asp
and asked that it be directly sent to Marty Gary (Dept. Management + Developement B-2). He is the source of the misinformation.
For those more local to him here is a way to get a retraction and correction into the paper,
His phone # is (410) 260- 8289. If several of us call him personally, a couple times each over the next couple days, he might get the message that that information needs to be corrected.
Be polite please.
guppy;523344; said:Great, I also posted another thread refering to this to try to get the members in that area involved.
fugupuff;523892; said:I guess I wasn't convincing enough...Here is what the paper replied...
Dear Wes:
Before I even went to the tackle shop, I contacted DNR, which sent out the
fisheries biologist in charge of IDing and certifying Maryland catches. He
has more than 25 years of experience.
I asked him specifically if the fish was a Pacu.
He told me that he has seen many Pacu--aquarium discards in local waters
and in their natural surroundings--and was sure this was a pirahna.
I double-checked his ID with the National Aquarium in Washington, which
concurred.
As far as the northern snakehead story, I broke that story. The fish in
Crofton DID NOT come from a restaurant. The two fish came from an aquarium
owned by an Asian man, who bought the fish so he would have a ready supply
of fish to make soup. When they got too big and his mother refused to
prepare anymore soup, he tossed them in the pond across the street from his
condo.
I have the police reports that include interviews with the men, who would
have been charged, but the law wasn't clear enough to make charges stick.
Further, in the creek behind the Dundalk tackle shop, there are two Oscars
swimming near the dock. So, sadly someone is in the habit of discarding
aquarium fish when it becomes inconvenient.
Sincerely,
Candy Thomson
