There is clearly atleast 12"x12" of bio balls in his sump. More than enough for double his stock.
I agree with you here that i have plenty of bio media in my sump. I dont think a lack of bio media is the problem.
There is clearly atleast 12"x12" of bio balls in his sump. More than enough for double his stock.
I agree with you here that i have plenty of bio media in my sump. I dont think a lack of bio media is the problem.
I agree with you here that i have plenty of bio media in my sump. I dont think a lack of bio media is the problem.
InterestingTechnically, there do exist bacteria, that are able to reduce nitrate to ammonia. Are there any dead spots (no current) in the tank/filtration system? The bacteria in question are anaerobic and normally shouldn't be a problem; however, the parameters described are not normal either. How deep is your sand level?
@fishmanbob87:
*you, *you.![]()
Sorry even if filters removing ammonia is "common knowledge" I strongly disagree. Out of the 50 plus tanks my father n I have running if we did not do water changes regularly the ammonia would spike sky high reguardless of how much bio media the sumps have.
Yeah it looks like your sump should be able to handle the load which is moderate in a tank that size.
Check your water supply first and once that looks good, make sure there's no waste built up anywhere in the system. Then either add bio to your sump or add a filter.
Just checked tap water it looks fine. Like i said before, i highly doubt that theres any waste buildup anywhere in the tank as i've been having problems with ammonia for months, and any waste i think would have decomposed by now..
Technically, there do exist bacteria, that are able to reduce nitrate to ammonia. Are there any dead spots (no current) in the tank/filtration system? The bacteria in question are anaerobic and normally shouldn't be a problem; however, the parameters described are not normal either. How deep is your sand level?
@fishmanbob87:
*you, *you.![]()