Male Cichlasoma Octofasciatum.
Cichlasoma isn't a valid genus anymore. It's "exCichlasoma" until they decide how to break it up.
But it is now currently in the Rocio genus (to my knowledge).
So it's actually Rocio octofasciata.
Here is the taxonomic history if you're interested:
(from http://www.cichlidae.com/gallery/species.php?id=169)
Heros octofasciatus, Regan, 1903, original combination.
Cichlasoma hedricki, Meek, 1904, junior synonym.
Cichlasoma octofasciatum, Meek, 1904, new combination.
Heros (Cichlosoma) octofasciatus, Regan, 1904, new combination.
Cichlasoma (Archocentrus) octofasciatum, Pellegrin, 1904, new combination.
Cichlosoma (Parapetenia) octofasciatum, Regan, 1905, new combination (wrong genus spelling).
Cichlosoma biocellatum, Regan, 1909, junior synonym.
Astatheros octofasciatus, Jordan et al, 1930, new combination.
Nandopsis octofasciatus, Kullander, 1996, new combination.
Archocentrus octofasciatus, Schmitter-Soto, 1998, new combination.
Nandopsis octofasciatum, Burgess, 2000, new combination (should have been octofasciata).
Rocio octofasciata, Schmitter-Soto, 2007, new combination.
If we're gonna use scientific names, might as well use the right one.
