Lacerdae Update

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
another thread gone spicy!
 
Don't worry, no high schooler here. Just seemed that you were trying to take the attention off the fact that you sold a misidentified fish as a much more expensive fish. Honestly, 125 is expensive for a mala, but it's definitely not lacerdae money. But, since you threw in the 55 gallon, I'd say that it wasn't that bad of a deal.
 
wait so Thefishguy needs his mommy to drive him around lol jks
 
very lovely fish.. always wondered about getting one..
 
if I had the slightest idea that it was not a lacerdae, I would not have tried to sell it as one. I had posted a pic of it previously and no one stepped in and questioned the ID

I am no fish expert and specially when it comes to wolfish
 
yes malas are very inexpensive. great point!

but I bought it as a lacerdae, and when I sold it the buyer took a good look and agreed that it was a lacerdae. I would honestly have no idea if it was one or the other, other then the fact that the vendor had it listed as a lacerdae. I hope this makes sense. I would never attempt to doop somebody.
 
What did I do. I sold a fish. the buyer picked it up, looked at it said "yep, thats a lacerdae, I will take it"

I didnt claim it was a lacerdae and then ship him a goldfish.

Are you reading the thread? HAve you ever been to Shark Aquarium, George the owner IDs wolfish all the time and takes many trips south to collect them. I trusted his word. I am completely it the right.
 
both myself(the original buyer) and the person who bought it from me were given the chance to look at the fish and understand that it was labeled as a lacerdae and then chose in both cases to buy the fish. There was no deception on either part. ANd I am sure that George isnt trying to label malas as lacerdaes
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com