LMB and foods other than pellets and shrimp!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Lol if i had a pet gator i feed it some low life human that wants to die... hah im kind of f****d up in general but its hard to gage on. Hah but if ones said person "fell" into the tank. hah Justp playing with u ppl.

Derpeder you are right im a long time Bass fisher and laff at some of the stuff that happen i have this little rattle ball lure that almost about 3" wide and had a small bass strike it and after take it out of him looked like he couldnt eat the damn thing. Maybe he hated it. It does look ugly as hell but it works.

I dont see any problem in letting the bass eat what ever it will eat. I dont see the big deal with pinkies... U want a show feed him a FROG! i was lucky today to find a small babe frog in my backyard and tossed him in... So far i think he liked it. Cuz he was still full 6hrs l8r O.o and i think the frog lasted some time inside him befor dieing.

Another Thing
 
Derpeder;641862; said:
and the whole feeding a kid to an aligator thing is sick.

I bet the alligator wouldn't think so.;) They don't think we're on top of the food chain.

we are human they are animals. sorry to say we are different and superior, and we are on the top of the food chain. We have Logic and Reason and oh oh oh a SOUL. They have instinct.

Humans are animals, this is scientific fact, like it or not. We are no different, we are not superior and we are not top of the food chain (I'm sure the many parasites that feed on us would argue with you on that one). There is no proof that we have a soul, there is no proof that other animals lack one. Living things have been on this planet for 3.7 billion year, humans a mear 1 million years. Do you really honestly think evolution stops with us? How arrogant could you be.
 
Polypterus;642235; said:
Does this thread have a point to it?

It really is rather infantile and immature to feed a live rodent, frog , turtle, child to a fish..... Especially to a stupid useless black bass...

First it was carp, then cichlids, now tell me PLEASE what the hell is wrong with black bass? Or wait...I bet if the LMB spent it's larval stage in the mud, fed off the blood in other fish's gills or was a rare species restricted to a tiny stream in the middle of a virgin forest it would be deserving of your admiration. No, they are a common successful species that humans have misused and introduced the world over, so they must suck as a species. There are wine snobs, there are car snobs, I didn't realize there were fish snobs.
 
This is great! Teleost is a Meanie, Polypterus is a fish snob, I want a name.
 
Derpeder;641850; said:
first of all teleost, your kinda mean. [QUOTE/]

You should meet the guy in the flesh, he steals candy from babies, beats up bums, and kicks puppies.:ROFL:
 
teleost;642731; said:
You seem pretty interested in sunfish.

I am pretty interested in sunfish but I still appreciate all the other species of fish that are out there as well. I keep 25 different species of fish, only 6 of them are sunfishes. They all have their interesting traits and behaviors. Be they largemouth bass or larval lamprey. I'm not going to judge another species based on it's distribution and relation to man, and I'm not going to judge the people that keep them either. It seems with polyopterus over there...popular and common=bad.
 
Skipjack;642766; said:
This is great! Teleost is a Meanie, Polypterus is a fish snob, I want a name.

Hey man, you're the one who told me to come here. I'm in fighing mode and if I see something that grinds my gears I'm gonna say something about it. Besides, I really like largemouths.:)
 
I am pretty interested in sunfish but I still appreciate all the other species of fish that are out there as well. I keep 25 different species of fish, only 6 of them are sunfishes. They all have their interesting traits and behaviors. Be they largemouth bass or larval lamprey.

I don't believe this statement makes any separation between you or the posts I've seen from Polypterus.

I'm not going to judge another species based on it's distribution and relation to man, and I'm not going to judge the people that keep them either. It seems with polyopterus over there...popular and common=bad.

You may not judge a fish on the fact that it's invasive/harmful but you seem willing to call Polypterus a fish snob. Why can't you judge a fish that's been thrown in hundreds of thousands of waters where it simply could never have naturally migrated yet you throw around judgmental terms about people as casually as tossing the car keys on the kitchen counter?

I'm willing to bet Polypterus has more feelings than any ratfish and he works to improve the natural environment for native fish while these introduced fish do the opposite.

I think you're not being intellectually honest with yourself.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com