I did want to add to my earlier post and add invasive species as a another major impact going against these fish/species and may well be a leading factor.
How am I wrong?
Are you telling me that if Someone was to breed two fish of species X with a little more red on them to produce a few of their offspring that has a little more red on them and I'm sure the majority of the fry would look "normal" only a few would have more red.
Then say to the world this is the Explosive Fire back draft X strain. That's not marketing?
All your doing is breeding species X it's still X you just gave it a name so that people can recognize your species X and I bet the price will be twice as much the a normal X.
Granted there's a little more involved but that's the gist of it.
Why on earth should anybody here feel ashamed about this complete strangers actions?
Please explain how you intend to do this.
I think he's aiming it at me and to the best of my knowledge I have no wild caught fish,just true forms.
I believe cyberpants here has F1 fish himself. I just think he gets a little excited and can loose the plot easily.)
Your argument maybe valid as to buying wild over super duper for me. Because I would not fall for the marketing name game.Simple answer there... Why bother... Coz there's a growing section within the hobby that wild or F1 or F2s are best. so people spend about £25 - £55 on one of these as apposed to £6 on a domestic specimen. That is marketing aswell isn't it? Dealer says I can get you wild Meeki I bet most of you would be prepared to shell out big bucks. Its like the Ivory trade.
Something you have done a lot.Loosing the plot is when you try and change the subject and get rude and personal..
So you also promote collecting fish from the wild to get decent domestic variants.y F1s i.e. Trimacs and Labs etc etc are present because there aren't any decent domestic variants available
There's electric Blue JDs, Electric blue Acaras, German Blue rams... the list is endless. I'd rather not have to many over keen hobbiests rading our natural rivers and ponds to feed a growing number of boastfull cichlid keepers
The biggest threat to most CA/sa cichlids does not come from the very small amount of fish imported into the hobby, it comes from pollution and evasive food fish. In fact if the locals or governments saw a financial gain to protect them they would.
The people who live around many of the catch locations are not rich. They need the money. If they can't get it exporting fish, they just might get it ruining those very catch locations. In many parts of the world, ecotourism is seen as form of conservation, because although it does damage the habitats, it provides incentive for the locals to defend their wildlife. The fish trade is the same.A lot of fish collecting points around the world are being conserved because of the hobby.
To some people it's their only source of income and they are learning to protect their interests.
It may not be my place to say this, but I think the OP dropped his end of this fight. If not, you can drop your end first.Thinking about it,I'm not the one that dropped an f1 stalsbergi in a 90 gallon and watched it rip apart a Trimac,salvini,red devil and a female stalsbergi.
I think your cruelty allegations should stop right there.
He started it down this road with his boastfull cichlid keeper comments and his comments that we should be ashamed of ourselves.It may not be my place to say this, but I think the OP dropped his end of this fight. If not, you can drop your end first.