Nemesis;3869549; said:I agree, whether the "sp. Catemaco" be classified as it's own species or not, it should be marketed with a different name. Might not keep the "sp", but something along the lines of laguna catemaco fenestratus, or pink fenestratus. Sort of like how carpinte are described by their collection location. If it is classified as a different species, then it should be named as such. I guess we all just have to wait and see. Can we also agree that there is a difference between the "piebald" and "pink" fenestratus?
Perhaps the "sp" should have not yet been given.
And as for dc, I could care less what anybody says about him. All I know is that he offers top quality fish at reasonable prices. And I will call them whatever he says they are until I am proven otherwise. I don't give a crap what anyone else says about them. Wild fish or not wild fish, new species or not new species, they're beautiful fish, and i wouldn't see them any differently.
Pink fenestratus has been a well used name for years. Yes, I agree there is a difference between the piebald and the pink........a difference in coloration!

As for DC, I would like to know why he came to MFK and denied being a supplier to my LFS only to reverse position later, but ultimately as long as he continues to supply cool fish I really don't care.
