xander;4394576; said:any possibility of elaborating on these husbandry protocols? anything out of the ordinary for the average gar keeper?
Well, I have some things I'm working on as far as Platostomus are involved (Can get to that sometime later) but really my point was that it is the development of these husbandry protocols that should be considered bringing gar keeping to "the next level"... It as always been said and I think understood that it is in this area the individual can help most in the continuing process of gathering and disseminating Gar information.
Aquascaping is not really an important detail as far as these fish go as long as it is satisfactory for the species. As my good friend already stated in so many words.. You really can not give a captive gar the same environmental conditions as a wild fish. even approximating in many cases is difficult.
I would be a bit upset and annoyed if this (aquascaping) was considered some type of measure to Gar husbandry. If your really interested in Natural or ecotype aquascaping then there are forums for that thing and for those interested. If this forum is about Gar then I would think it should be GAR that is the centerpiece.. not the tank they are in.
Focus on the fish..
I disagree wholeheartedly with the OP's idea that aquascaping is a measure of Lepisosteid captive husbandry and seriousness in keeping an animal. This is mostly aesthetics and not the core substance which is proper husbandry.
Now there is a whole different thing that has had little discussion and really no one looking at. This is using a tank layout, chemical and temperature profiles and parameters in such a way that it provides for the enrichment of the fish by allowing novel and unique occurrences that may stimulate the fish. This is a new area of research for these fish. Something maybe some of you Garfans out there can think about and even experiment with.