Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff!!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
The BLM was founded for the purpose of facilitating ranchers grazing their cattle on public lands. When the BLM started using the fees paid by those ranchers to kick them off of this land (and Nevada by Nevada law it is a free range state), he stopped paying the BLM in protest. He offered to pay his fees to the state, but they didn't want it. He has continued to pay his fees into a trust.






You two are profoundly ignorant and are blatantly insulting to the uniformed services of his country. The largest militia organization that is responding to this crisis are the Oath Keepers, an organization I am proud to be a member of.

The Oath Keepers are comprised solely of Americans who have sworn an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. This is military, law enforcement and elected officials. If you've never taken that oath, you can't join.

We, the police and military, who believe in the Constitution are more dangerous to America than Muslim radical terrorists? Surely you jest.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App


No jest here. So you think Muslim groups are more of a threat here than domestic terrorists? And how am I insulting our uniformed service? Well see what your "oath" is worth once it really hits the fan.
 
no wonder ..those sources are all right wing blogs...find a court ruling ,if you want any credibility , not your instruction manual on one sided internet posting...nothing personal but thats all opinionated garbage not any verifiable two sided news or court ruling..you might as well quote RUSH LIMBAUGH AS YOUR SOURCE..LOL
I posted in full about a major COURT ruling, finding huge ongoing misconduct by blm & usfs agencies, agents, as well as other co-conspirators (the court finding, NOT opinion).
Do I have to post hundreds of pages of court transcripts for that to be valid ?
I would therefore like to request that Lee be barred from this discussion for his refusal to cease flinging attacks with the term "right wing". I am absolutely sick of NON fact based comments.
 
I am taking a break from this too. hopefully some people will study beyond "first impressions", the tossing around of hot button words, and stereotypical misconceptions that ranchers are so wealthy that you should resent them.
I personally don't resent ranchers at all.. just those(people) that think they have been a "right" to make a living at a failed business plan at the expense of the taxpayer ..these are all antiquated 19th century laws that might need upgrading...the BLM may well abuse their power in some cases but do you really think "free range"has any place in 21st century AMERICA..?I want tickets to that show (riot):popcorn:
 
Mods please get Lee out of here for now. He refuses to read the exact info he demands, then calls it opinion when it's posted..
 
No jest here. So you think Muslim groups are more of a threat here than domestic terrorists? And how am I insulting our uniformed service? Well see what your "oath" is worth once it really hits the fan.

I personally have observed that any organization with freedom or liberty in the name seems to have a certain anti- govt bend to it ...seems to crop up when they think the "other side" is in charge . notice it kinda disappeared in the last decade , while it was kookoo gone bug turd in the 90's & now
 
read the legal ruling or stfu.

now now .. play nice :) your'e SOURCES have no credibility,show me a link to a real news source(not political opinion rags in disguise) or actual court documentation...BTW what does STFU mean?..I bet it isn't fit to print on mfk...
 
...the Nevada district court issued a 104-page ruling detailing the federal agencies’ “vindictive,” “shocking,” and “nonsensical” actions against the Hage family...
HERE IS A LINK TO ALL 104 pages of THE COURT RULING:

http://blog.pacificlegal.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Findings-of-Fact-and-Conclusions-of-Law.pdf

read it if you can, Lee. Otherwise, stfu.

was this court ruling subsequently overturned?...and what part of it's ruling ,IN YOU OPINION, applies to the current case, counselor...and if it was subsequently overturned, you do realize it has ZERO VALIDITY...?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com