Looks like the base of a red, you'll have best luck posting this in the Arowana section. Best of luck!
Official Off Topic Discussion Thread #1
- Thread starter Chrisplosion
- Start date
I've been doing some farm work for the past week, particularly on a commercial piggery. I must say the amount of work and management going into porkchops is pretty high!
Welcome aboard
Start a new thread click forum scroll down to Ancient Fish you will see Arowana make new Thread. You will get your answer from experienced members.
Understood but judgement was on hold due to appeals. Trump and republican congress had a choice that they can continue with the way the bill was designed but chose not to because they fundamentally disagree with it and want it dead. I’m all about looking forward and think the law needs lots of fixing which they don’t seem up to the task. All I will say is that they better figure something out because I’m not sure I want to be in a single payer system that democrats want to push us to.
It did similar favors for my retired and living on a very fixed income mother too.
I know ive said this before but i cant believe its just status quo. Nothing changed and it doesnt look like it will any time soon. We just keep on going eating the crap that we are given but in the meant time we watch cities burn and countless riots of perceived social injustice
Let's not forget the hundreds of millions that the health insurance companies paid to make sure that the clause that would have prevented premiums from increasing and those in congress that accepted the money to make sure of it.
I'm sorry if I misunderstand you. This is just my opinion and I'm no lawyer. I have no special insight & no secret connections. I read the decision months ago.
What Trump did was to "continue with the way the bill was designed." It was obama who ignored the bill and did exactly what the bill did not allow him to do.
The bill was intentionally designed with no funding by congress to pay the insurance companies. There wasn't going to be funding for it or if so, only when they wanted. It was intentional. And the constitution reserves all funding to Congress.
This to me has been the key part: unfunded projects can't be independently funded by the President by circumventing Congress and having the Treasury print money and give it to people. That's completely unconstitutional. It overrides one of the most important safeguards the people (congressional representatives) have from a president who wants to run the country on his own. No president who respected the constitution would do that for something so completely unimportant as insurance company profits.
Maybe, just maybe, that's why it hasn't made it the Supreme Court from the last court decision that was made 16 months ago, while other disputes from this year are being fast tracked. It's as if people know what the court will rule and they just don't want to hear it. My suspicion is it will be another 9-0 decision against our ex.
Last edited:
