Yeah.....guess everyone's out enjoying the heat.So slow here the last few days....
Yeah.....guess everyone's out enjoying the heat.So slow here the last few days....
This whole...."suspension of rights of open carry" thing started with Obama mentioning it during one of his speeches a few days ago.He uttered some foolishness to the effect that the police will have difficulty knowing who is shooting at them due to so many people open carrying at protest rallies.....eh,here is a news flash,the person who is shooting won't be carrying because he will be aiming.....so now we have the head of the police officer's union who has mentioned suspending those carry rights until the convention is over.The governor has already said that he does not have the power to impose such a measure.Hello; Here is an opinion question for you. The noon news stated that there is a request (from the police i believe)(who actually made the request is not important to the question) that open carry be suspended in Cleveland Ohio during the RNC.
My question - Generally what does anyone think about such a suspension of carry rights?
More to the point for me is the potential effect this might have on the people of Cleveland going about their ordinary businees and having nothing to do with the political convention. I get that the authorities hope to prevent potential problems associated with the convention, but how will that help the average person not involved with the convention?
Hello; I did not know this, but am not suprised. Does not miss a trick nor shy away from pushing his agenda.suspension of rights of open carry" thing started with Obama
Hello; This is true and logical.the person who is shooting won't be carrying because he will be aiming.....
Hello; This is good in my opinion. I hope they do not find a way around it. A right that can be suspended at the whim of a politican is not much of a right. If "it" (a right)(any sort of right) can be suspended for this reason, then it's a fair bet some will find many other reasons to suspend.The governor has already said that he does not have the power to impose such a measure.
Absolutely not.Should my right of __________________( free speech, assembly, vote, fair trial and so on) be liable to be suspended because some one else "may" do something?