evilxyardxgnome;1412898; said:But when I feel creative I will try and make some cool backgrounds.
Thats where I try to play with my depth of field....Backgrounds can be a huge bonus-But can also draw attention from the pic
evilxyardxgnome;1412898; said:But when I feel creative I will try and make some cool backgrounds.
Miles;1412905; said:What do you mean photoshop is cheating?!@![]()
davo;1412916; said:you did that in picassa? That's not bad.
Yeah, like I said, gotta think of it as developing...
Miles;1412921; said:yeah I sharpened it in Picassa and watermarked it in Imageforge..
akskirmish;1412920; said:Sure it looks much better to someone that has never seen my fish in person-
But looks un natural to me-----I guess it's just cause I know my fish doesn't look like that....
Dont get me wrong-I appreciate the help in all of this and am loveing this little discussion.....
Not if it was your fish and I have never seen it before and you had only posted the editted pics-
Then showed me the the other pics-I might be amazed-----


akskirmish;1412936; said:When I try to edit in Browser and try to sharpen an image-
How come it never works-I can never tell a difference from the before to after pic-
Also you had to do soemthing else beside the mentioned-or does sharpening a pic change the coloration-
I love being a newbie sometimes-Damn beginners
Miles;1412947; said:I agree it looks unnatural.. I wen't a lil overboard![]()
As you can see in the ray pics I usually try to depict them as natural as possible.. but I am a horrible photo taker and a quick 'sharpen' tool in an image editor really depicts the pictures better for me..
If it is your conquest to take perfect pix, look at CDM and AquaMojo.. maybe ask them if they use any image editors?
oh yeah btw I have a super red tiger reticulata for sale, $1000..![]()
![]()