Thanks all for the comments. 
The re-assignment to Paraneetroplus is open to debate to be honest. There is no right or wrong way, either Paraneetroplus, Paratheraps or Vieja for this moment in time. The paper only concludes a revision of species in the new proposed genera.
I would like to see the scientist argue this subject out first before i commit to any new proposed re-assignments, however it would make things easier. Watch this space.
Thanks for the info! So many people on here corrected me saying that paraneetroplus synspilus is vieja synspilus in a thread I started. I knew the sp. was reclassified, and this confirms.
Very nice pair!
The re-assignment to Paraneetroplus is open to debate to be honest. There is no right or wrong way, either Paraneetroplus, Paratheraps or Vieja for this moment in time. The paper only concludes a revision of species in the new proposed genera.
I would like to see the scientist argue this subject out first before i commit to any new proposed re-assignments, however it would make things easier. Watch this space.
