Polar Bear swims 300km and then is....

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Hawkfish is right but that still doesnt stop me and all the other tree hugging mfk'ers from saying


those dumb effin police. still sad. first thing out of my mouth when i saw that article....."son....of...a...*****"
 
adamstv;1870969; said:
Hawkfish is right but that still doesnt stop me and all the other tree hugging mfk'ers from saying


those dumb effin police. still sad. first thing out of my mouth when i saw that article....."son....of...a...*****"
Click to expand...

I completely agree with you! Like I said, the police were being lazy, and didn't want to do things the responsible way. It's aggravating!
 
:popcorn:
 
No one should be suprised about this. Anyone ever see the commercial about the "human element"? Whenever I do I can't help but mumble "you mean the element of destruction?"...
 
Maybe Im the only one that read the article or the only one with enough reading comprehension skills to understand that it wasnt the police's descision to kill the bear, rather Icelands Environment Minister (I assume their version of F&G).

MFK is so full of irrationale people that just think with their emotions instead of their brains.

Killing the bear saved probably tens of thousands of dollars and the perhaps even the life of a human and was completely justified in my book.
 
JD7.62;1872815; said:
Maybe Im the only one that read the article or the only one with enough reading comprehension skills to understand that it wasnt the police's descision to kill the bear, rather Icelands Environment Minister (I assume their version of F&G).

MFK is so full of irrationale people that just think with their emotions instead of their brains.

Killing the bear saved probably tens of thousands of dollars and the perhaps even the life of a human and was completely justified in my book.
Click to expand...

Uh, yeah, the guy who's in charge of the bills. I got that. Yes, it would have cost more to do it the right way.
 
Whos to say that spending money on one rogue polar bear is the right way?

Lets just say that the bear ended up here in KY. Id rather F&G kill it with a few rounds that cost the state maybe $0.10ea then spending thousands tranqing it and transporting it that could go into say stocking a trout stream. By choosing to stock that trout stream the benefits would be better overall then trying to save the bear. The local tackle shop would get more buisness and its employees/owners would have more money to spend on things, the state will get more tax revenue to even further better things, and so on and so forth.

You see, you people need to take a step back and look at the big picture of how the real world works with the big boys in it.
 
i dont care they should not have killed an INDANGERED SPECIES!!!!!!!
my life dream was to see a polar bear in the wild(or a snow leoperd:D)
and based on global warming which could be our fault!!!! i probably cant do that ever!!!
stupid effin police!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:irked::irked:
 
Nothing like a good ol' condescending attitude to garner support for your point of view...

There ARE more ways to look at this situation than just this one. What about researching the bear's behavior to see why it swam this far in the first place. (Although I suspect the cause of this particular problem is environmental.) Maybe it's just going to happen again. Wouldn't it be better to prevent this from happening repeatedly, rather than continuing to kill the bears, which are listed as threatened. This is only one other way to look at the situation.

I'm going back to playing with my Legos now, you and the other "big boys" can discuss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom