question about releasing fish

rodgerpidactor

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Oct 9, 2007
214
0
0
earth
I see people saying not to ever release a fish after it has been in an aquarium but then i see other people who say never to do it EXCEPT when it was caught in a private lake/pond and you release it back into that exact same body of water. how does this change the circumstances?? cant ducks and other animals transfer fish eggs of "infected" fish from the private lake/pond to another body of water?? is it okay to release a fish after its been in an aquarium if it was caught in a small body of water as to a big reservoir ??? forgive me if this was covered in the sticky i tried to find it in there.....
 

amesbien

Gambusia
MFK Member
Sep 20, 2006
567
0
16
The Moon
I think it is just best to say that it is NEVER OK to release a fish back into the wild, under any circumstances.
 

crazyman229

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Aug 20, 2007
239
0
0
regina
if u dont want the fish just eat the fish
 

Mystix212

Fire Eel
MFK Member
Jun 27, 2007
4,991
6
68
30
Brisbane, Australia
If your returning the fish back to its natural habitat, I dont see any harm. Its because foriegn fish compete for food and kill the native fish which is why you shouldnt release aquarium fish. Like for example, a noob releasing a 12" oscar in a flourishing habitat full of tetras and discus.
 

ercnan

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Mar 14, 2006
790
0
0
The End Of The Yellow Brick Road
Here, DNR regs. state that no fish can be released into any public body of water. Private property obviously is different if you own it or have written permission from the owner.
This from the DNR website.http://www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/fish/fishng/2007RFG/large/Fishing%20Regulations%20pgs%2042-55.pdf
Illegal Fish Stockings and Aquarium Releases
No individual may take any live fish (native or nonnative) and
release it into any other public waters without a stocking permit.
Fisheries biologists in the DNR approve stocking of fish only
after careful consideration of the potential impacts of the new
fish on existing habitat and fish population.
Sale of Aquatic Life
No fish, frogs, turtles or other reptile or amphibian taken under
a fishing or hunting license may be bought, sold or bartered. You
may keep fish that you catch for an aquarium if that fish meets
legal size and bag limit requirements
. If you give your catch
away, it’s a good idea to provide that person a note identifying
the fish you gave them. This avoids confusion with exceeding
the daily bag limit or possessing fish without a fishing license.
 

Onion01

Polypterus
MFK Member
Aug 8, 2007
6,178
15
92
Miami
Mystix212;1231156; said:
If your returning the fish back to its natural habitat, I dont see any harm. Its because foriegn fish compete for food and kill the native fish which is why you shouldnt release aquarium fish. Like for example, a noob releasing a 12" oscar in a flourishing habitat full of tetras and discus.
Or even worse, a breeding pair of 12' oscars
 

sandtiger

Captain Planet
MFK Member
Feb 14, 2005
3,547
4
0
39
NY
Birds cannot move fish eggs by them sticking to them. Fish eggs are sensitive and die quickly when removed from water. The reason why most say that private ponds are alright is because private ponds are typically not connected to larger bodies of water.
 

rjmtx

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jul 14, 2007
410
0
0
Louisiana
There's the parasite issue, too. People never think of the invasive parasites and diseases, which can have effects similar to when Europeans first made contact with Native Americans.

I don't see a moral problem with releasing a fish exactly where you caught it if it was kept in a sterile tank quarantined from all other fish, but this is rarely the case. When I'm sampling fish, we don't even use a net we were using in another body of water if it is still wet. It's so we don't transfer any nasties to creatures that may have never had any contact with them.
 

davo

Aimara
MFK Member
Jan 9, 2006
17,529
39
132
England
You don't release them back, I think its an offence in most places. You could be introducing nasties back into the body of water. You do not do it, period. This is a topic covered many, many times.
 

cenecker

Gambusia
MFK Member
May 15, 2005
836
3
18
41
Eternal, Impenetrable Darkness
Yep its against the law and the concern is that you might release an infected fish.

Ex: you catch a green sunfish from a lake and put it in your tank with your wild-caught african cichlids (not that like ANY africans are wild-caught but bear with me :)). What you don't know is that one of your africans caught evil malawi fish malaria (no not a real disease) and it's in remission right now. Now your green sunfish has evil malawi fish malaria and you release it back to the lake you got it from...every fish in the lake gets evil malawi fish malaria and given that its an exotic disease that NOTHING in the lake has any chance of immunity to...the whole freaking lake dies...

That is if no one say...caught another infected green sunfish and then released it in another lake or river...

Obviously this case is the exception not the norm...you could probably catch and release a hundred green sunfish and never actually wipe out the whole state with an exotic disease but the law is there because if it DID happen it could be disasterous.

Dont release fish! :)
 
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store