^EXACTLY. it isn't that it has happened, but it happens CONSISTENTLY.Juxtaroberto;4718079; said:I think the reason most people have RTCs that max out at around 3.5' is because of stunting, or poor water quality, or tank too small for them. It's not like someone somewhere once pulled out a 5' RTC from the Amazon, and it's never happened again. Fishers have consistently pulled out 5' RTCs from their natural habitat, so it is safe to assume that is their average size. Their shortcomings in the home aquaria are not an excuse for smaller tanks, but a consequence of them.
1st, comparing wild fish sizes to captive fish sizes is anything but ridiculous...It is the size the fish SHOULD be able to match or come close to.Pyramid_Party;4735836; said:I find it funny how people can be so inconsistent with their beliefs. They argue how cruel it is to keep a certain fish in a certain size tank, yet you search one of their tank threads and see their tanks overstocked. Almost every guy who keeps pbass and aro's keep them in tanks too small.
I hate how they also throw out wild fish sizes. We damn well know that if the biggest wild caught fish is 6 foot, it DOES NOT mean EVERY fish will reach that size. Comparing wild fish with captive fish is ridiculous. And it's even more ridiculous to tell people not to keep fish because they get too big and you yourself turn around and keep fish that will outgrow your tank.



Deep Blue Sea;4542502; said:Mods please close this thread, it was ment to be a thread where people could voice their opinions about what they thought a minimum tank size for an RTC could be but it seems to have come to name calling and flaming








FLESHY;4741061; said:You cant really ask an LFS to do that...a really amazing one might have the facilities to take one back at a large size, but anything else is probably asking too much.
Even holding a large fish for a long period of time can wear a hole in a guys pocket, they want to get little fish they can feed flake, and move them out as fast as possible, nothing else.
jprp;4740180; said:I looked at this thread a long while ago, but have not looked at all the intermediate posts- so apologies for going over old ground.
My current thought on the monster fish situation is this:
Retail outlets should not be able to sell fish with a large potential size (and by this i will go as LOW as 6in fish) unless they-
A: will always take back said fish and re-house them OR
B: Provide a build on site service for suitable sized accomodation for the adult fish.
It seems odd to me that a shop can sell fish with a potential of 3ft + when they only sell tanks 12in wide?!