loconorc;2424576; said:Define social first, as some people seem to disagree on that, leading to further arguements. Reptiles certainly aren't Ivy League, but we either give them too little or too much credit as far as mental capacity. They wouldn't evolve certain behaviors if they don't benefit them in the wild, so it depends on what reptile we are talking about on whether or not being social will help their survival.
Anyone can look up the definition of social, its available in any dictionary and it is going to mean the same thing. So for us to define social is a bit useless because were using it in its most literal context.
Secondly mental capacity has really no corealation as to whether it is social or not. That just shows us problem solving skills, intelligence etc....
Third evolution is just a process of elimination so this will tie in with mental capacity and using that ability inherited by past generations for survival tactics.
Every reptile performs an event that is considered a social interaction, they all mate. But besides that interaction are they considered social animals when there is a congregation for survival purposes or to share a resource is what the underlying question is.
Clearly this is all assumption/opinion, due to noone giving a crap about reptiles to further study these ineractions and classifying them so its up to the hobbyist and groups of interest to come up with their own conclusion.
They just dont botter trying to cach them at that particular time