JD7.62;2449058; said:While personally for anyhting but new born rays I dont think the type of sand matters. But if you look at those pics posted, the sandblasting sand is MUCH more coarse then the aquarium sand.



andersp90;2448663; said:
And in the end, its down to common sense.
Just look at rays and where they live/come from. The Amazon river system.
Why is the river so brown and dark? Because its filled with millions open millions of tiny tiny particles. Like silica dust.
So there probably wouldnt be any rays left in the wild, if they really did die from fine sand or small particles.
Again, this is just common sense.

csx4236;2449056; said:Not a sand problem well loses with sand or no loses without sand. Whats your rational for saying not a sand problem? It's quite easy to understand nothing else changed except removing the sand. Something more rational would maybe be they are using a different type of sand in Germany then I was using or maybe not but to just assume it was something else besides the sand is not having an open mind.
Miles;2449104; said:Common Sense would tell you that if a ray was irritated by anything in the wild it could just 'vacate the area'... and in a glass box - they do not have that option.
Very poor argument ... Would be like comparing humans to rays.. or cichlids to rays.. or trying to say ammonia isn't toxic to rays..![]()
An animal that is made to live on sand? 


Miles;2449114; said:Using the word 'fine sand' is very generic and their are many different styles of sand available..
To say the sand in europe is the same as the sand we are using here, or the same sand we are discussing, is probably not a wise assumption.
