If you read earlier on I think I said DNA sexing, thats the only way to be 100% sure. The is a way to question what has been said (like when I said I disagree and want to see a source of info) as upposed to just knocking someone back, you never know if someone is onto something (unless its completely stupid). Anyways I feel that ignorance is not giving someone a chance to present their case before saying they are wrong so that is why I said what I did.
SEXING?
- Thread starter menace83
- Start date
piscevore;648044; said:
Yes you did mention DNA. However, under no circumstances has anyone prevented anyone else on this thread from presenting his case. When a user comes up with such "controversial" info & then on the next reply answers with a statement like "how much do you want to bet"..what do you expect the general public to react? Understand this, there is a fair amount of users here with quite a lot of experience dealing with aros...lots of these guys DO know what they are talking about.
Don't take this the wrong way. Peace.
same way I did, ask him to give us a source of info. However we are all individuals and we all act in a different manner so I cant expect everyone to react the same way can I. Any way lets just agree to disagree this is getting stupid.
May I also apolagise, didnt mean to be offensive to anybody.
May I also apolagise, didnt mean to be offensive to anybody.
From the book "Arowana world" is where I got the information. It says something to the effect of: There have been documented cases of female arowana holding eggs in the situation that the male runs out of room to hold the entire clutch of eggs.Chaos32;635368;635368 said:
I've been wondering for a while now about the book. It was pretty poor in translation. There are some sections that just don't make any sense.Chaos32;649367;649367 said:Ahh..the Taiwanese book..I shall reread it.
