stingray magazine article

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
DavidW;4320760; said:
I tell ya, it seems like there's hardly a single mind on this forum capable of subtle Freudian thinking
:)

Sr Bleher: I don't agree with your methods , and often not with your information either. I think that as someone with a high profile in the aquarium magazine world it is incumbent upon you to go out of your way to respect and follow the laws in whatever country you are visiting, and to do what you try to do in the most rational and scientific and LEGAL manner.
"'Experts" know this!
I will soon read this article with interest, and if I disagree with it or find it to be derivative I reserve the right absolutely to express my own opinion. If what you write cannot withstand simple criticism then it is weak.
If you constantly have a fit every time someone says anything that disagrees with you then perhaps you should reconsider your O.C.D. use of the internet and all the fish forums.
Information can (and should) be challenged with newer/better information , and usually the writer should not be attacked ad hominem. Bad spelling or grammar is sometimes annoying but it is the information that is important.
BUT: when there are certain patterns of questionable actions then that obviously speaks to the credibility and veracity of the writer.
A giurar presti i mentitor son sempre!

Until then I am satisfied that I have made my point .

Hey thats great! Im happy to see how somebody argumentation can change from grade stupid argumentation to grade clever argumentation why not from the start?? It would be very sad if everyone had the same opinion but its the way this opinion is articulatet and fundet with knowledge to make the opinion worthwile and not just warm air!!
 
DavidW;4320760; said:
I will soon read this article with interest, and if I disagree with it or find it to be derivative I reserve the right absolutely to express my own opinion. If what you write cannot withstand simple criticism then it is weak.
.

I like how you are already getting ready to talk bad about the article you have never read.

What if you like the info? Will you post on here about it or just slide away with no noise.

For your own sake, just don't read it. You have already dismissed it and its information becuase of strange grudge you have against the author.

I ,for one, have always enjoyed Heiko Bleher's books and articles and use them as reference all of the time. I'm really looking forward to reading this article soon. I just wish I could find a hard copy in the States.
 
Just Toby;4320635; said:
MODS: PLEASE can you close this thread, it is going nowwhere and it is degrading to the forums as it simply goes round and round with insults.


QFT
 
Heiko Bleher;4320648; said:
Hi,

there are only two guys insulting me, you should have looked at it. Why I still do not know.

And fortunately there are some wise (good) guys definding me because they know my work and envolvement in this hobby and finally also some others started to read my stingray article, which is what this thread is all about.

best regards
Heiko Bleher

if you think you are doing great work can you please let me know why you are not liked by so many people

if its only good you have done i cant understand why so many people dont like the things you have done in the past
 
Oh brother...This thread turned into a personal debate at its worst especially calling out the attention of Mr. Heiko Bleher unnecessarily just to waste his precious time straightening these unnecessary allegations out.:irked:

And next time, any of you feel the need to ridicule someone, do it elsewhere, not here in MFK, please! Candid discussions are always welcomed but blatantly insulting and ridiculing someone is not. I and the staff will not need to remind the same perpetrators next time this happens.

Thread is done. Have a good day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com