DavidW;4320760; said:I tell ya, it seems like there's hardly a single mind on this forum capable of subtle Freudian thinking
Sr Bleher: I don't agree with your methods , and often not with your information either. I think that as someone with a high profile in the aquarium magazine world it is incumbent upon you to go out of your way to respect and follow the laws in whatever country you are visiting, and to do what you try to do in the most rational and scientific and LEGAL manner.
"'Experts" know this!
I will soon read this article with interest, and if I disagree with it or find it to be derivative I reserve the right absolutely to express my own opinion. If what you write cannot withstand simple criticism then it is weak.
If you constantly have a fit every time someone says anything that disagrees with you then perhaps you should reconsider your O.C.D. use of the internet and all the fish forums.
Information can (and should) be challenged with newer/better information , and usually the writer should not be attacked ad hominem. Bad spelling or grammar is sometimes annoying but it is the information that is important.
BUT: when there are certain patterns of questionable actions then that obviously speaks to the credibility and veracity of the writer.
A giurar presti i mentitor son sempre!
Until then I am satisfied that I have made my point .
Hey thats great! Im happy to see how somebody argumentation can change from grade stupid argumentation to grade clever argumentation why not from the start?? It would be very sad if everyone had the same opinion but its the way this opinion is articulatet and fundet with knowledge to make the opinion worthwile and not just warm air!!
