If you stopped foaming at the mouth for a minute, you would first off notice that I didn't state anything of the sort, I posted in quotes " " what a Seachem rep posted several years ago in an attempt to explain the process to a layperson. Those weren't my words.
Ok, still with me so far?
Then go back and please note that the patent that you keep referring to, is a patent to a completely different product, made by a completely different company. HELLO - anybody home? Seachem has zero affiliation with AquaScience Research Group, better known as ARG. The patent that you have been posting about, referring to via the Tetra patent, and for some bizarre reason still babbling about, is a patent NOT held by Seachem.
Are you still with me, Doc?
The patent that you keep referring to is for ChlorAm-X, a water conditioner created by John Kuhns, from ARG. Allow me to direct you to a little history on ARG, and the inventor who holds the patent that you keep referring to. (as Seachem's?)
http://www.reef2rainforest.com/2015/06/16/aquarium-inventions/
My only apology in all of this is that I didn't catch your mistake on the patent holder and product inventor early on yesterday, but I was preoccupied at work and apparently don't have as much free time on my hands as others.
Just another classic example of why one has to be so careful when reading things on the internet. The information being supplied is always only as good as the person supplying that information.
Your right i missed the quotes, so i apologize for that.
The patent i keep going ion about is for SEACHEM PRIME, HELLO are you there? The other patent gives the chemical as SEACHEM as shown in a screen shot from there own PATENT admits they didnt know how it worked.
Yes i am aware PRIME has THREE patents, they were updated as OTHER companies researched and got the information that SEACHEM couldnt work out!
That is why i keep mentioning Tetra because the TETRA patents mention PRIME and give the reaction, i would of used SEACHEMS reaction equation, except SEACHEM dosnt have one because they didnt know how it worked. Great company that sells a product without first knowing how it worked..........
I am aware about John and being the inventor, i also said early on that SEACHEM didnt patent or make anything themselves, they brought it from him. I have no idea if the company is part of SEACHEm or whatever. Yes the product was Chlor X originally but according to SEACHEM it is the patent for their product. I got the patent from them!
Let me clear this up for you.......
How did i get the patent number?
We needed it at work for some related but different research, we contacted Seachem via the University we were working with. SEACHEM came back with 3 Patent numbers for PRIME and 2 for SAFE. So how do you explain it not being their product? I didnt ask them as a individual, they were asked by an official academic department, i would be blown away if they lied about a patent in those circumstances. I cant entertain the notion they would risk doing such a thing.