Thanks Steelayer, but I didn't really give any advice other than; Think a bit about why you consider tanks too big/small...like many things in life, it has nothing to do with reason and logic, and everything to do with what is "normal".
SimonL;4048078; said:What we call "keeping fish in aquariums" puts our needs before the welfare of fish in general.
Comparing human mental conditions to a fish is a mistake far too many people on this forum make, fish do not have anywhere near the cognitive abilities of a human, nor do they understand concepts of freedom.



Zoodiver;4051748; said:Better question:
Why is the most common practice to keep fish in the 'minimum tank size'?
Why not ask what fish you can provide excess space for with your given budget instead?
Fish per tank will vary by species. You need to account for bioload, physical size, swimming behavior and a host of other factors. There is no math forumula to solve it, there is no catchy phrase or limerick to help you give the entire world of fish a set rule on space. Instead use common sense, fish knowledge and research.
syddakyd;4052070; said:i dont really care about stocking levels or what is accepted as compatible on text.
i have only 2 emperor 400's and a fluval 403 on a 125 with
2 flowerhorns, 1 jag, 1 tex, 1 sysnspilum, 1 blood parrot, 3 cons, 6 lilfali jewels, 1 rainbow shark, 1 golden algae eater, 1 syno eupterus, 9 african knives, 1 ram, 4 cory cats.
i overstocked with cichlids to spread aggression so now my original fish aren't picked on. i do water changes as needed. (usually 2-3 times a month) at about 1/3 with my python. i clean my filters out probably once every 2 months.
water crystal clear/fish have erect fins and are bright and healthy. everyone has plenty of territory and places to swim.
my fish dont die so i trade some in occassionaly if i want a "new look" lol.