The Great Global Warming Swindle

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
CichlidPharmer;852955; said:
You are the one who has been insulting people's intellligence with your mostly halfbaked mostly false rambling assertions.

I commmend David for his persistence in exposing the real liars, which include you.:screwy:

I totally miss your absence.

mmmm I dont even know who you are. Please refresh my memory of my halbaked rambling assertions. And you better have something to back it up since YOU are calling me a liar.
 
it is trolling I'm not denying that. But when I see you IMO falsely bashing moderators of this forum I don't like it. I just think people should know the whole story about why you were close to getting banned other than just your THEORY. I'm actually kind of surprised that you don't bash any of the people who support your ideas, as often their statements are poorly worded and confusing. I suppose that's why they like you so much. You are a very smart and intelligent person and I have no problem with that. You put your opinion out and when I feel like it I post my opinion. I just want the other opinion to be represented fairly.

you have removed my doubt and I stand corrected

Politics, from whatever side, needs to be able to pass the 'laugh test' also ( credibility)

I don;t just dislike the politics of the 'Right', I dislike politicians in general. 'Leftists' are no better.
Personaly I find myself increasingly Anarchistic, just wishing that all politicians would just leave me the 'F' alone

two of the above quoted, insulting intelligence, posts were directed at me this was your response to the last one. I honestly couldn't believe you wrote this I thought the bodysnatchers came and got you or something. In the next thread when I was trying to ask you questions all you did was call me stupid and ignorant :screwy: without answering any of my questions so I do not feel like taking the time to reply to your questions when you do not do the same for mine. Instead I will choose to ignore them and write this post. :D

edit: I have said my peace, people can take it for whatever they want and I will contribute no further to this thread unless I am insulted or called a liar again. The above is all my opinion.(that's my disclaimer :) )
 
ammerman19;852983; said:
mmmm I dont even know who you are. Please refresh my memory of my halbaked rambling assertions. And you better have something to back it up since YOU are calling me a liar.

There you go again. I rest my case.

When you actually see the truth, you won't even recognize it.
 
DavidW;851550; said:
banned?
I am sure you regret that that was not the case, tho I was threatened with it by a moderator who was not doing so well in a debate..and you still didn't answer the questions...maybe you can't?
I;ll wait to respond until someone at least tries.
As for holding your breath....well, its a start
:)
(j/k)

A moderator is taking sides in this debate and using his position to silence you?

Shame on him whoever he is! He does not deserve to be a moderator. It speaks volumes of who the moderators are on this forum, and quite possibly the owner too:( .
 
JuanTamad;853190; said:
A moderator is taking sides in this debate and using his position to silence you?

Shame on him whoever he is! He does not deserve to be a moderator. It speaks volumes of who the moderators are on this forum, and quite possibly the owner too:( .

As far as I know what he is talking about has nothing to do with THIS thread in particular. It was a month back or so. Please correct me if I am wrong David.
 
"Scientists say because of global warming they expect the world's oceans to rise four and a half feet. The scientists say this can mean only one thing: Gary Coleman is going to drown."
 
DavidW;865823; said:
I thought this thread was about global warming?
Are you disputing that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?
OK, so here is a CO2 related article.

as far as I know there aren't many scientist that dispute whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas or not. but i do know that scientist are not in agreement as to how large of a player CO2 is in the grand scheme of things

you see the Micheal Jordan would have to be the Sun when it comes to variables that effect global temperature and climate
Scottie Pippen would probably be water vapor
but then who would Horace Grant be? cloud cover? CO2? the wobble of the earth's axis? the specific heat capacity of the oceans? the varying distance of the earth from the sun? or one of the other millions of variables?

if CO2 is Horace Grant then there might be cause for concern. If CO2 is one of the lesser known players on the early 90's Bulls then who is to say how much it would have effected their over all performance. On the other hand we do know the entire team if effected depending on how good of a day Jordan is having
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com