The Walking Dead

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
With all due respect drew, i can morally support what she did. She felt their back was against the wall and they needed to do something to protect the people she loves and cares for

She had no idea itd continue to spread. If it hadnt, would you still cast judgement on her?


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
no way dude. you can't justify killing them

they were isolated, quarantined. she didn't need to kill them. I get that she made a decision for the sake of everyone but you can't go around smoking people because you felt they were a threat. especially when the threat wasn't even fully understood or known. at that point it was just theory.


and for some reason, I don't want daryl being leader. I want him to remain a mr. spock. second in command, kick ass when he needs to and can lead occasionally but remain a mr. spock
 
You guys cant make up your mind anyways, you were pro shane wanting to kill the kid they rescued without knowing his intention, just casted judgement on him based on his groups action and supported the group torturing him

And then anti carol wanting to do the same? End a threat. I see these 2 actions no differently


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
did I want the kid killed? I remember thinking I was against rick saving the kid in the first place. should've never saved him when he had his leg stuck on that fence.

and no, I did not cast judgment with no validity. hard to not cast judgment when you were just in a fire fight with someone. is that baseless passing of judgment?

I understand the reason behind what carol did, but disagree with what she chose at the time. again, I just feel she jumped the gun when no one was sure of what was happening yet. and her actions can't just be swept under the rug.
 
I agree they shouldn't have saved the kid just to kill him and maybe it wasnt you directly but it seemed the majority of the posts were like YEAH! STRING HIM UP!!! after the rescue

I think carol's intent warrants a free pass and a strict warming that she cannot play God




Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
yea I remember being upset with rick for putting them in that situation because he saved that kid. I would think i'd probably free him from the fence, to give him a fighting chance. but I wouldn't have taken him with me

I think rick's decision was solely to look out for himself and his kids. he just didn't trust her around his kids anymore because of her playing god thing

it makes me think,......a leader should be someone with no family, no kids, no wife. because the bottom line is, when crap hits the fan, their family comes first
 
I think rick is being a hypocritic to a degree. He was more then willing to kill the Kid for lesser 'charges' then the threat those two had
 
Rick is not fit to lead and arguably never was. She could have went back But tyreese would have killed her. That's the only reason Rick "banished" her that and he doesn't trust her around his kids anymore. Remember Carl told him about her teaching the kids how to kill. Plus she made the decision to bring those other 2 in without question. She was becoming a loose cannon. I bet carol pops back up with the gov. on a side note I'm glad Lori and Andrea are gone especially Lori since she has Rick raising Shane's baby.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom