This aint good

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Okay, this will be my last post on this thread since I feel like I have opened a can of worms here, I want to close it and leave it alone.

People are not exactly sure how many of these pythons there are but we know there are a bunch and we know that we want them gone. I have been down to the glades and I have caught a pair of these pythons before. During that trip, myself in addition to everyone I was with were told that even if we caught these horrible invasives, we were not allowed to keep, sell, trade, or even kill them and that no wildlife was to be removed from the area w/o a further permits. We HAD gotten permission to go herping so long as we released everything that we found where we found it but we had also planned to keep any invasive snakes we found to bring them farther north (where they could not survive) for a profit. The irony of it being that the FFWCC does not want the snakes in the park but they will not allow for them to be removed from the park either.

On a similar note, humans have all but extirpated the FL panther that used to be the apex predator in the park. Recent surveys show that there may be less than 100 left in the glades according to my mammal-culture class. with that being said, the pythons are in essence replacing this role and are killing about the same prey (birds, small gators, household pets, fish, etc.) that the panthers were. I am not saying that this is a good solution, just that these snakes are not as dangerous to the environment as everyone says.

Once again, I will make the argument that the permits that are in place are more than suitable to prevent the further release of the snakes in question if they were enforced.

@ Koidaddy:

you say that everyone should just go ahead and get the permit now but in many cases (such as mine) I have the permit but am currently not in possession of any of the big five that it covers since I am living in an apartment. I do -or if this passes, did- plan on acquiring some once I have the capability to care for them. With the current bill that is in place, the only thing that gets grandfathered in are the animals already in captivity and the permit holders loose their rights to purchase more. You are also forgetting about the future herpetologists whom could want to own these snakes responsibly years down the road who will never get to know how fantastic these animals can be.

Also, you speak as if you are some oppressed victim in some of your posts. I did not once insult in the least but I did find your comment about the "warm welcome" you received at this site rather annoying. If you do not want to have your opinion disagreed with, then you have no business posting in any sort of forum where opinions are discussed, refuted, accepted, and fought over.
I am sorry that you do not feel that we like you because your opinion is different but the truth is that we need a variety of opinions in order to generate a real discussion.

No hard feelings in any way.

I leave this thread with a protest to the irony of the FFWCC's actions. Below is a picture that some of you may have seen before containing the 2 snakes that were released (by order of a game officer).

attachment.jpg
 
As Americans, we seem completely obsessed with maintaining the status quo, even as it regards to wild animals. We need to realize that the planet is an ever changing world, and some animals come and some animals go. All we can do is try to limit how many species we usher to extinction.[/QUOTE]

another species migrating into an area and taking over is a completely different issue than people taking an animal that is evolved to one area and one set of predators and placing them somewhere else. if something becomes extinct naturally WITHOUT any kind of human interaction then thats just the way of things and its sad but they used up their time on this planet, and its the new animal that beat the odds and moved into the areas time to reign. but when people interfere and introduce animals that would NEVER naturally enter an area then there is no defence of the native animals against it, and no predator to keep its populations in check and they take over everything. however if florida would just enforce the rules already in the books like you said, then we wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. and the laws about exotics passed in any state is a precursor to further legislation in other states. every court ruling leads to another and builds off of each other so if states see that florida implements this then they will think that they can as well and then everyone is screwed. and as for the person saying it wont be a problem if you just get your permit now. well that's a very selfish way of thinking. what about the people who become interested in reptiles after this law is put in place. its not just about you its about everyone who comes after you as well and their right to responsibly own what they want no matter what month/year they decide to do so.[/QUOTE]
That would be ok...in a human less world. People have put barriers that are virtualy IMPOSSIBLE to trespass to many species that would otherwise disperse naturaly. Most really big mamals for example are isolated in "islands" with no where else to go. If something like a natural catastrofy happens you can say bye to them
 
Conner;3946368; said:
I agree completely! I would like someone to name a single species brought near to extinction solely due to an introduced invasive species in Florida. Most natives being pushed to extinction were already heading that way due to habitat destruction and pollution, both due to human encroachment. The invasive species may be taking a toll, but its just a pinhead added on to the impact humans are having.

The politicians like to use headlines splashed across the news to "scare" people into action, which is really just getting public backing to push through an agenda that doesn't benefit anyone but the politician and whoever is making donations to their reelection fund...
And the "special" interests groups from where much funding its coming from, PETA and the HSUS, wich have the total ban of pets in their agenda:screwy:
 
Following snake guy´s lead I will also say a thing that has surprissed me about this snakes. Somewhere in the beggining of the thread someone said "what is the interest in keeping a snake that can kill a human being". Well to this I will say that the beaut is in the eye of the behoulder but there is more to this. First of Im not into big constrictors, not because by anymeans I dislike or fear them but not only dont have the space, but also they are still ilegal here and also to tell the truth never really tougth long and hard about it. But if I were to ever keep one of this guys, to say that I would respect him would be a understatement. I would really keep him isolated with sliding doors kind of setup in a room habitat of its own, much like in a zoo. I however see people that have this and other large constrictors and dont have HALF of this safety precautions, however NOTHING HAPPENS! They treat the snakes like golden retrivers, and at least aparently the snakes are puppy dog tame! Not that anybody should try to replicate this but its a important clue to show that "its not as bad as it looks". And this are not some "krazy oddball hippies", many people with large constrictors regulary handle and pet them like a dog. In Great Britain burmese pythons are not even in the restricted snake species, lots of people keep them and you dont see people getting killed by them in the news. I say its all about: public education (this snakes get huge, they can be dangerous,etc), a reasonable permit sistem and basic, comon sence safety precautions and YOUR SAFE. As for the litle florida girl...yes that was a HORRENDOUS acident:( I however should say that just a wille ago here a rottweiller that was a loving family pet killed a family´s todler, ANIMALS ARE ANIMALS, we can not ask them to be people. In the dog´s case the people didnt introduced the child to the dog and he reacted like it was a stranger. In the python case, that snake ESCAPED THAT NIGTH LIKE 12 TIMES OF ITS CAGE BEFORE THE ATACK TOOK PLACE! AND THE GUY DIDNT DO A THING ABOUT IT!
 
koidaddy;3946078; said:
Sorry you think I have a selfish way of thinking. I really am not that way and would give whatever I have to someone else. After being bent over by everybody who needed help, it hardens you some.

That, and raising ungrateful kids.:D
i didnt say that you were a selfish person i just said that only thinking about the people who own the snakes right now without a single concern for the future people who want to keep these animals was a little selfish. its not just about the people right now its also about those down the road, especially younger kids, who grow up and fall in love with these animals and want to keep them responsibly when they are older
 
coura;3946342; said:
Im going to ad a few more things to spice this up. The Florida Politicians seem very conserned over the "envoirement" because of all this new invasives and stuff. Well my friends, were they so conserned over the envoirement when they created a special licence that allowed construction companies to deliberately kill/crush/sufocate dozens of gopher tortoises at a time, in their own burrows, to build malls, golf corses, etc, on top of their once territory, in "exchange" of purchasing a tiny fraction of the destructed area in another place to be set aside as gopher toise habitat? This thankfully is over but went on quite a few years and its not a "pretty" thing to do when the animal your killing is older then your granmother. This not envoiremental conserns, they want to get as much votes as possible, if building a new mall gets just that then what a heck with thouse "crawlys". You guys dont need no invasives species! You kill your own nature by yourselfes! Was the burmese python responsable for allmost vanishing the florida panther out of the face of the earth? NO. You did it yourselfes and "brougth" it back from the brink to have the "nice and numerous population" you have today. Invasives are a prob but they are a grain of sand in a ocean...


Coura how true that is. I recall we talked about this in a post think yr ago and I posted the pic of the once lush tree area with ponds which was acres as far as the eye could see which was bulldozed down (can't track down the pic).
I used to go to see baby turtles in summer now just flat dry soil

It was a turtle paradise and now just flat barren land . Think the real estate deal fell through it was going to be a few gated communities with golf courses and that is the real invasive killer.

Real problem in Florida and than they blame pythons and other exotics-
"Officials have allowed people to build throughout the panther habitat, granting permits for a new university, new churches, roads, golf courses and subdivisions"

http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060202/LOCAL/202020323/1078/news
 
snakeguy101;3946376; said:
Okay, this will be my last post on this thread since I feel like I have opened a can of worms here, I want to close it and leave it alone.

People are not exactly sure how many of these pythons there are but we know there are a bunch and we know that we want them gone. I have been down to the glades and I have caught a pair of these pythons before. During that trip, myself in addition to everyone I was with were told that even if we caught these horrible invasives, we were not allowed to keep, sell, trade, or even kill them and that no wildlife was to be removed from the area w/o a further permits. We HAD gotten permission to go herping so long as we released everything that we found where we found it but we had also planned to keep any invasive snakes we found to bring them farther north (where they could not survive) for a profit. The irony of it being that the FFWCC does not want the snakes in the park but they will not allow for them to be removed from the park either.

On a similar note, humans have all but extirpated the FL panther that used to be the apex predator in the park. Recent surveys show that there may be less than 100 left in the glades according to my mammal-culture class. with that being said, the pythons are in essence replacing this role and are killing about the same prey (birds, small gators, household pets, fish, etc.) that the panthers were. I am not saying that this is a good solution, just that these snakes are not as dangerous to the environment as everyone says.

Once again, I will make the argument that the permits that are in place are more than suitable to prevent the further release of the snakes in question if they were enforced.

@ Koidaddy:

you say that everyone should just go ahead and get the permit now but in many cases (such as mine) I have the permit but am currently not in possession of any of the big five that it covers since I am living in an apartment. I do -or if this passes, did- plan on acquiring some once I have the capability to care for them. With the current bill that is in place, the only thing that gets grandfathered in are the animals already in captivity and the permit holders loose their rights to purchase more. You are also forgetting about the future herpetologists whom could want to own these snakes responsibly years down the road who will never get to know how fantastic these animals can be.

Also, you speak as if you are some oppressed victim in some of your posts. I did not once insult in the least but I did find your comment about the "warm welcome" you received at this site rather annoying. If you do not want to have your opinion disagreed with, then you have no business posting in any sort of forum where opinions are discussed, refuted, accepted, and fought over.
I am sorry that you do not feel that we like you because your opinion is different but the truth is that we need a variety of opinions in order to generate a real discussion.

No hard feelings in any way.

I leave this thread with a protest to the irony of the FFWCC's actions. Below is a picture that some of you may have seen before containing the 2 snakes that were released (by order of a game officer).

View attachment 472795


Great post maybe they actually don't want them gone might serve some agenda because its beyond unreal that you had to release them.
 
Seems like a more effective solution is a ban on breeding and transporting humans across state lines into florida. :naughty:
 
that poor little girl

forgive me for saying this but at least fish don't eat children

I have a corn snake, and have had other snakes , but, I just do not see the reason to own a snake that can kill a human being.

:(




Where do you think you are this is monsterfishkeepers baby all are fish can eat children hell some of them can eat adults !

and I shouldn't have to say this but sharks are fish to:ROFL:
sorry to derail but someone had to call that out.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com